Neoconstitutionalism, Third Philosophy of Law

被引：3
作者：
Barberis, Mauro [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Trieste, Dipartimento Sci Giurid Linguaggio Interpretazion, Piazzale Europa 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
来源：
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO-JOURNAL OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY | 2012年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词：
Philosophy of Law; Constitutionalism; Ethics; Principles; Balancing;
D O I：
10.4477/37400
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
At present there is a third philosophy of law, other than natural law and legal positivism, which I label neoconstitutionalism, and others describe as constitutionalism, nonpositivism, theory of law as integrity or as interpretation, inclusive positivism, postpositivism, and so on. In the last section I consider how neocostitutionalists could answer questions on philosophy of law proposed in this first issue of the Journal of Legal Philosophy; the other sections of this paper provide a further reconstruction of neo-constitutionalism, after my contributions of 2011, and against Ferrajoli and Guastini. In the first section, the paper distinguishes neoconstitutionalism from constitutionalism, old and new; in the following three sections it reconstructs neoconstitutionalist stances on law-moral problem, theory of norms, and legal reasoning analysis.
引用
收藏
页码：153 / 164
页数：12
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
Dworkin R., 1989, IMPERO DIRITTO
[12]  
Dworkin R., 1977, DIRITTI PRESI SERIO
[13]  
Ferrajoli Luigi, 2010, GIURISPRUDENZA COSTI, V3, P2771
[14]  
Ferrer Beltran J, 2011, JERARQUIAS NORMATIVA
[15]  
FIORAVANTI MAURIZIO, 2009, VALORE COSTITUZIONE, P3
[16]  
Friedrich CarlJoachim, 1953, VERFASSUNGSTAAT NEUZ
[17]  
Garcia Figueroa A., 2009, CRIATURAS MORALIDAD
[18]  
Garcia Figueroa A., 1998, PRINCIPIOS POSITIVIS
[19]  
Guastini R., 2011, SINTASSI DIRITTO
[20]  
Guastini Riccardo, 2011, TEORIA POLITICA, V1, P147
1234