Neoconstitutionalism, Third Philosophy of Law

被引:3
作者
Barberis, Mauro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trieste, Dipartimento Sci Giurid Linguaggio Interpretazion, Piazzale Europa 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
来源
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO-JOURNAL OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY | 2012年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Philosophy of Law; Constitutionalism; Ethics; Principles; Balancing;
D O I
10.4477/37400
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
At present there is a third philosophy of law, other than natural law and legal positivism, which I label neoconstitutionalism, and others describe as constitutionalism, nonpositivism, theory of law as integrity or as interpretation, inclusive positivism, postpositivism, and so on. In the last section I consider how neocostitutionalists could answer questions on philosophy of law proposed in this first issue of the Journal of Legal Philosophy; the other sections of this paper provide a further reconstruction of neo-constitutionalism, after my contributions of 2011, and against Ferrajoli and Guastini. In the first section, the paper distinguishes neoconstitutionalism from constitutionalism, old and new; in the following three sections it reconstructs neoconstitutionalist stances on law-moral problem, theory of norms, and legal reasoning analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 164
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Alexy R, 2012, TEORIA DIRITTI FONDA
[2]  
ATiENzA M., 1996, PIEZAS DERECHO TEORI
[3]  
Azzariti G., 2007, INTERPRETAZIONE COST
[4]  
Barberis Mauro, 2011, MANUALE FILOSOFIA DI
[5]  
Barberis Mauro, 2011, ANALISI DIRITTO, V2011, P11
[6]  
Bobbio Norberto., 2014, GIUSNATURALISMO POSI
[7]  
Celano B., 2002, LA LEGGE E I DIRITTI, P89
[8]   American balancing and German proportionality: The historical origins [J].
Cohen-Eliya, Moshe ;
Porat, Iddo .
ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2010, 8 (02) :263-286
[9]  
Comanducci P., 2002, NEOCOSTITUZIONALISMO, P71
[10]  
Comanducci P., 1998, HACIA TEORIA ANALITI, P75