An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction-A Case Series
被引:73
作者:
Downs, Ronald K.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Plast Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
St Joseph Reg Med Ctr, Dept Image Recovery, Mishawaka, IN USAIndiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Plast Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
Downs, Ronald K.
[1
,2
]
Hedges, Kellee
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ctr PC, PC Comprehens Plast Surg, The Ctr, 611 E Douglas Rd Ste 108, Mishawaka, IN 46545 USAIndiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Plast Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
Hedges, Kellee
[3
]
机构:
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Plast Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] St Joseph Reg Med Ctr, Dept Image Recovery, Mishawaka, IN USA
[3] Ctr PC, PC Comprehens Plast Surg, The Ctr, 611 E Douglas Rd Ste 108, Mishawaka, IN 46545 USA
Background: The practice of breast reconstruction continues to evolve with the introduction of new technologies. The authors describe a unique approach allowing immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction that can be performed on an outpatient basis. Methods: After a nipple-sparing mastectomy, acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-covered implants are placed in a prepectoral position in an immediate reconstruction. Assessment of results was performed via a retrospective review of demographic and procedural data. Results: Forty-five patients (79 breasts), mean age 46.8 years, were treated with direct-to-implant reconstruction using ADM-wrapped implants placed above the muscle with mean follow-up of 23.1 months (median 22 mo). Mean body mass index was 24.3, and 15 patients (33.3%) were current or former smokers. Twenty-seven patients (60%) had prior breast surgery with 22 (49%) exposed to chemotherapy and 34 (76%) radiation. Procedure time averaged 155 minutes and hospital length of stay averaged 0.6 days. Complications included flap necrosis in 22 cases (28%), seroma in 12 (15%), infection in 8 (10%), rippling in 28 (35%), and contracture in 8 (10%). In 14 breasts (18%), postoperative wound complications (flap necrosis or infection) led to implant loss. Conclusions: The availability of ADM and cohesive gel implants has allowed us to perform above-the-muscle implant breast reconstruction in reduced time and often on an outpatient basis. Complication rates were comparable to expected results of standard expander-to-implant, staged breast reconstruction. This technique is a viable option delivering clinically and aesthetically acceptable results in select patients.