Key contextual success factors for employee innovative behavior: A study in a foreign manufacturing subsidiary in China

被引:20
作者
Zhou, Wenqian [1 ]
Velamuri, Vivek K. [1 ]
机构
[1] HHL Leipzig Grad Sch Management, Fac Entrepreneurship & Technol Transfer, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
employee innovative behavior; key success factors; foreign subsidiaries; China;
D O I
10.1080/23311975.2018.1471770
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Employee innovative behavior has been recognized as a key enabler for competitiveness in China. As more and more foreign multinational companies (MNCs) are setting up innovation activities in China, fostering employee innovative behavior is playing an increasingly central role in their development strategies. However, while there is an abundance of literature on contextual success factors to foster employee innovative behavior set in Western contexts, there has been little attention on the impact of culture-specifics in China. Also, there has been limited effort to determine the relative importance of the factors and define which ones are key. We address these gaps by conducting a Delphi study set in a foreign manufacturing subsidiary in China. Among a list of 24 success factors identified in extant literature, our results reveal reward and pay, cross-functional cooperation and company innovation strategy as the three most important factors to foster employee innovative behavior in China. We discuss these factors as to why they play a vital role for Chinese employees and finally we provide practical suggestions for implementing them. These include the set up of transparent guidelines for rewards, enhancing cross-functional cooperation and setting aligned goals among different functions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Abdullah N. H., 2014, ICMIT 2014 INT C MAN, DOI [10.1109/ICMIT.2014.6942404, DOI 10.1109/ICMIT.2014.6942404]
[2]  
Abstein A., 2014, CREATIVITY INNOVATIO, P1, DOI [10. 1111/caim. 12053/full, DOI 10.1111/CAIM.12053/FULL]
[3]  
Ahlstrom D., 2021, BUS HORIZONS, V44, P59, DOI [10.1016/S0007-6813(01)80036-7, DOI 10.1016/S0007-6813(01)80036-7]
[4]   The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science [J].
Anderson, N ;
De Dreu, CKW ;
Nijstad, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) :147-173
[5]   Transformational Leadership, Innovative Behavior, and Task Performance: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes [J].
Aryee, Samuel ;
Walumbwa, Fred O. ;
Zhou, Qin ;
Hartnell, Chad A. .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2012, 25 (01) :1-25
[6]   Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas [J].
Axtell, CM ;
Holman, DJ ;
Unsworth, KL ;
Wall, TD ;
Waterson, PE .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 73 :265-285
[7]  
Birkinshaw J, 2001, HARVARD BUS REV, V79, P131
[8]   The "human side" of open innovation: The role of employee diversity in firm-level openness [J].
Bogers, Marcel ;
Foss, Nicolai J. ;
Lyngsie, Jacob .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (01) :218-231
[9]   Innovation-receiving subsidiaries and dual embeddedness: impact on business performance [J].
Bresciani, Stefano ;
Ferraris, Alberto .
BALTIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (01) :108-130
[10]   The Emergence of China and India as New Competitors in MNCs' Innovation Networks [J].
Bruche, Gert .
COMPETITION & CHANGE, 2009, 13 (03) :267-288