Justice bubbles for the privileged: a critique of the investor-state dispute settlement proposals for the EU's investment agreements

被引：14
作者：
Vastardis, Anil Yilmaz [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Essex, Sch Law, Colchester, Essex, England
[2] Univ Essex, Human Rights Ctr, Colchester, Essex, England
来源：
LONDON REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL LAW | 2018年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1093/lril/lry020
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
This article criticises the judicialisation of investor state dispute settlement in the direction envisaged by the EU's Investment Court System because it prioritises institutions of justice for foreign investors over the improvement of local institutions that could provide justice for members across society, including foreign investors.
引用
收藏
页码：279 / 297
页数：19
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Aisbett E, 2016, 2016122 GEG, P5
[2]   Firm characteristics and influence on government rule-making: Theory and evidence [J].
Aisbett, Emma ;
McAusland, Carol .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2013, 29 :214-235
[3]  
Alvarez J, 2011, PUBLIC INT LAW REGIM, P113
[4]  
Anderson MR, 2003, 178 IDS, P3
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CNBC 0201
[6]  
Blackaby N, 2015, REDFERN HUNTER INT A, P71
[7]  
Chimni BS, 2006, INT COMMUNITY LAW RE, V8, P3
[8]  
Choudhury B, 2015, ASIL INSIGHTS, V20
[9]   A national survey of the civil justice problems of low- and moderate-income Canadians: incidence and patterns [J].
Currie, Ab .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION, 2006, 13 (03) :217-242
[10]  
Dembour M- B, LONDON REV INT LAW
1234567