REVIEW OF RECENT TAXONOMIC CONCEPTS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN THE GRACILARIACEAE (RHODOPHYTA)

被引:46
作者
BIRD, CJ
机构
[1] Institute for Marine Biosciences, National Research Council, Halifax, B3H 3ZI, NS
关键词
GENERIC CONCEPTS; SPECIES CONCEPTS; SPERMATANGIA; GONIMOBLASTS; DNA; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY;
D O I
10.1007/BF00004000
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Despite much effort in the past decade to resolve the taxonomy of algae in the Gracilariaceae, the family remains problematic. Generic concepts have become equivocal as their diagnostic reproductive features have been reported as mixed in single species. Species concepts are often also uncertain since the full phenotypic range of a species is seldom known or appreciated. This paper reviews some of the recent taxonomic controversy from the viewpoints of morphology and molecular biology. As more observations are made, features like spermatangial configuration and mode of gonimoblast nutrition, once considered characteristic of genera and subgenera, are emerging as a continuum of types that may vary within species. Culture studies to establish the reproductive anatomy of a life history and to test crossabilities are invaluable to species concepts but also may yield false results owing to clonal variability and intraspecific sterility. Characteristics of DNA have been effective in clarifying some aspects of gracilariacean taxonomy and phylogeny, and may be able to resolve the major inconsistencies if more widely applied.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 267
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[31]  
Guiry M.D., Modern approaches to the analysis of red algal morphology and systematics. Species concepts in marine red algae, Progress in Phycological Research, Vol. 8, pp. 251-278, (1992)
[32]  
Hay M.E., Norris J.N., Seasonal reproduction and abundance of six sympatric species of Gracilaria Grev. (Gracilariaceae
[33]  
Rhodophyta) on a Caribbean subtidal sand plain, Eleventh International Seaweed Symposium, pp. 63-72, (1984)
[34]  
Irvine L., Steentoft M., (1151) Proposal to reject the name Fucus verrucosus Huds. (Rhodophyta), Taxon, 44, pp. 223-224, (1995)
[35]  
Kapraun D.F., Karyology and cytophotometric estimation of nuclear DNA content variation in Gracilaria, Gracilariopsis and Hydropuntia (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta), Eur. J. Phycol., 28, pp. 253-260, (1993)
[36]  
Kapraun D.F., Dutcher J.A., Cytophotometric estimation of inter- and intraspecific nuclear DNA content variation in Gracilaria and Gracilariopsis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta), Botanica Marina, 34, pp. 139-144, (1991)
[37]  
Kapraun D.F., Dutcher J.A., Freshwater D.W., DNA base composition heterogeneity in some Rhodophyta, Crypt. Bot., 4, pp. 97-106, (1993)
[38]  
Kapraun D.F., Dutcher J.A., Freshwater D.W., Quantification and characterization of nuclear genomes in commercial red seaweeds: Gracilariales and Gelidiales, Fourteenth International Seaweed Symposium, pp. 679-688, (1993)
[39]  
Krishnamurthy V., The genus Gracilaria in India, J. Phycol., 27, 3, (1991)
[40]  
Lewmanomont K., The species of Gracilaria from Thailand, Taxonomy of Economic Seaweeds, with Reference to some Pacific Species, Vol. 4, pp. 135-148, (1994)