The primary physical education curriculum process: more complex that you might think!!

被引:23
作者
Jess, Mike [1 ]
Carse, Nicola [1 ]
Keay, Jeanne [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Moray House Sch Educ, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ West Scotland, Vice Chancellors Off, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
关键词
Complexity thinking; primary physical education; learning tasks; core learning; connectedness; similarity and diversity;
D O I
10.1080/03004279.2016.1169482
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this paper, we present the curriculum development process as a complex, iterative and integrated phenomenon. Building on the early work of Stenhouse [1975, An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann Educational], we position the teacher at the heart of this process and extend his ideas by exploring how complexity thinking and ecological perspectives have helped us frame the curriculum process as self- organising, emergent, recursive and interactive. As such, we present a curriculum approach that recognises the need for teachers to concurrently develop appropriate knowledge and understanding of the learners they work with, the environment in which they work and the capacity to design learning tasks appropriate for this context. We discuss how the complexity principles of similarity and diversity offer a frame of reference to design learning tasks that bring connectedness and coherence to the primary physical education experiences of children and teachers. However, in line with Stenhouse, our ideas are not presented as a 'package of materials or a syllabus of ground to be covered' but as a complex and ecological learning process that is more 'a hypothesis testable in practice' and an invitation for critical evaluation 'rather than acceptance'.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 512
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Using a complex and nonlinear pedagogical approach to design practical primary physical education lessons [J].
Atencio, Matthew ;
Yi, Chow Jia ;
Clara, Tan Wee Keat ;
Miriam, Lee Chang Yi .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2014, 20 (02) :244-263
[2]   The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review [J].
Bailey, Richard ;
Armour, Kathleen ;
Kirk, David ;
Jess, Mike ;
Pickup, Ian ;
Sandford, Rachel .
RESEARCH PAPERS IN EDUCATION, 2009, 24 (01) :1-27
[3]  
Ball S.J., 2012, SCH DO POLICY POLICY, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203153185
[4]  
Biesta G., 2010, COMPLEXITY THEORY PO, P5
[5]  
Biesta G. J. J., 2008, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[6]  
Bransford J. D., 2000, PEOPLE LEARN BRAIN M, VExpanded
[7]  
Byrne D.S., 1998, COMPLEXITY THEORY SO
[8]   Primary teachers as physical education curriculum change agents [J].
Carse, Nicola .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2015, 21 (03) :309-324
[9]   Complex and nonlinear pedagogy and the implications for physical education [J].
Chow, Jia Yi ;
Atencio, Matthew .
SPORT EDUCATION AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (08) :1034-1054
[10]  
Cilliers P., 2008, EDUC PHILOS THEORY, V40, P213, DOI [10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00407.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1469-5812.2007.00407.X]