EXTRACTING LAMBDA((MS)OVER-BAR) FROM EXPERIMENT

We show that standard next-to-leading order (NLO) perturbative QCD analyses used to extract alpha(s) from e+e- annihilation data do not serve to disentangle the completely unknown renormalization scheme (RS) invariant next-NLO (NNLO) and higher-order uncalculated corrections from those dependent on the renormalization scale in a predictable manner. The resulting quoted values of alpha(s)(M(Z)) (LAMBDA(MSBAR)) with attendant scheme dependence uncertainties, therefore, reflect.the ad hoc WaY in which they were extracted, rather than the actual values of these parameters. Choosing the scale so that the NLO coefficient vanishes (effective charge scheme) exposes the relative size of these unknown RS invariant higher-order terms. They are seen to be sizable for some of the e+e-observables, indicating that they must be estimated if LAMBDA(MSBAR) is to be determined reliably. This can be accomplished either from NNLO calculations, at present only available for the hadronic width of the Z0(R(Z)), or nonperturbatively by writing the RS-invariant uncertainty in LAMBDA in terms of the running dR(Q)/d In Q of the observable R(Q) with energy using an effective charge formalism. The NNLO calculations for R(Z) and CERN LEP data supplemented by lower energy DESY PETRA data lead to LAMBDA(MSBAR)(5) = 287 +/-100 MeV. We also discuss how the effective charge approach can be used to remove scale dependence from next-to-leading logarithm resummations of some e+e- observables.