Consumer-Based Evaluation of Commercially Available Protected 18650 Cells

被引:8
作者
Baksa, Steven [1 ]
Yourey, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Engn, Hazleton Campus,76 Univ Dr, Hazleton, PA 18202 USA
来源
BATTERIES-BASEL | 2018年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
lithium-ion; 18650; cells; consumer; cost; gravimetric; volumetric; capacity; energy;
D O I
10.3390/batteries4030045
中图分类号
O646 [电化学、电解、磁化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Over the past few years, the use of 18650 form factor lithium-ion (Li-ion) cells have transitioned from primarily commercial applications to consumer/residential use. An evaluation of eight commercially available, circuit protected, 18650 form factor Li-ion cells were performed, with analysis focusing on a residential consumer evaluation of performance. As typical consumer cell usage occurs at a relatively low discharge rate, cells were evaluated between 4.2 V and 2.7 V at C/10, C/5, and C/2 discharge rates. The evaluated cells ranged from "high-cost" Panasonic, Hixon, Orbtronic, and EastValley cells to "low-cost" UltraFire (UF) and Eilong cells. Initial discharge comparisons revealed that no cells delivered their nameplate capacity, with a large overstatement of cell capacity occurring for low-cost cells. On average, high-cost cells delivered 92.5% of their advertised capacity, with low-cost cells delivering 20.6% at a C/10 rate. Basing consumer evaluation on a cost per unit capacity and/or cost per unit energy, even with this large overstatement in capacity, low-cost cells still offer an advantage over higher-cost alternatives. The average cost per amp-hour for each cell group ranged from $1.65 to $3.38 for the low-cost and high-cost cell groupings, respectively. Analysis of voltage profiles highlighted two chemistries used in cell production, coinciding with each cell grouping.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Augeard A, 2014, ELECTR CONTACT, P157
[2]   A Database for Comparative Electrochemical Performance of Commercial 18650-Format Lithium-Ion Cells [J].
Barkholtz, Heather M. ;
Fresquez, Armando ;
Chalamala, Babu R. ;
Ferreira, Summer R. .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 164 (12) :A2697-A2706
[3]   Cost Projection of State of the Art Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles Up to 2030 [J].
Berckmans, Gert ;
Messagie, Maarten ;
Smekens, Jelle ;
Omar, Noshin ;
Vanhaverbeke, Lieselot ;
Van Mierlo, Joeri .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (09)
[4]   The Development and Future of Lithium Ion Batteries [J].
Blomgren, George E. .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 164 (01) :A5019-A5025
[5]  
Burke A., 2009, EVS24 INT BATT HYBR, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11116-007-9132-X
[6]   Lithium-Ion Battery Storage for the Grid-A Review of Stationary Battery Storage System Design Tailored for Applications in Modern Power Grids [J].
Hesse, Holger C. ;
Schimpe, Michael ;
Kucevic, Daniel ;
Jossen, Andreas .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (12)
[7]   Effects of Capacity Ratios between Anode and Cathode on Electrochemical Properties for Lithium Polymer Batteries [J].
Kim, Cheon-Soo ;
Jeong, Kyung Min ;
Kim, Keon ;
Yi, Cheol-Woo .
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2015, 155 :431-436
[8]   A comparison of lead-acid and lithium-based battery behavior and capacity fade in off-grid renewable charging applications [J].
Krieger, Elena M. ;
Cannarella, John ;
Arnold, Craig B. .
ENERGY, 2013, 60 :492-500
[9]  
Morley R., LITHIUM ION 18650 BA, V3
[10]   A Comparative Testing Study of Commercial 18650-Format Lithium-Ion Battery Cells [J].
Muenzel, Valentin ;
Hollenkamp, Anthony F. ;
Bhatt, Anand I. ;
de Hoog, Julian ;
Brazil, Marcus ;
Thomas, Doreen A. ;
Mareels, Iven .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 162 (08) :A1592-A1600