Is All Reification Forgetting?: On Connerton's Types of Forgetting

被引:0
作者
Timcke, Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Commun, Burnaby, BC, Canada
来源
TRIPLEC-COMMUNICATION CAPITALISM & CRITIQUE | 2013年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
Memory; Labour Process; Reification; Forgetting; Critical Theory; Paul Connerton;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Drawing upon early the Frankfurt School tradition, I offer a qualified defence of Connerton's version of collective forgetting against recent detractors. This defence pertains strictly to the material culture aspects of collective forgetting. In this respect, the paper argues that models of individual and collective memory must attend to the historical forces that combine to (re) produce a particular environment, and further, they should consider the subsequent role the reproduction process plays on triggering moments of recollection or collective memory actions. To explicate this claim, I draw upon a Marxist inspired account of the labour process to show that variations in types of consciousness are related to particular modes of production. It is my intent to explicate Connerton's theoretical reasoning such that readers from diverse backgrounds are better informed about his underlying set of assumptions. In this respect, this paper aims to contributing notes towards a political economy of memory.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 387
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, H MARCUSE CRISIS MAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, REIFICATION NEW LOOK
[3]  
Bergson H., 1988, MATTER MEMORY
[4]  
Bourchouladze Rusiko, 2002, MEMORIES ARE MADE TH
[5]  
Campbell S., 2003, RELATIONAL REMEMBERI
[6]  
Connerton P., 1989, SOC REMEMBER
[7]   Seven types of forgetting [J].
Connerton, Paul .
MEMORY STUDIES, 2008, 1 (01) :59-71
[8]  
Connerton Paul, 2009, MODERNITY FORGETS
[9]  
Derrida J., 2001, FORGIVENESS COSMOPOL
[10]  
Edelman, 2000, UNIVERSE CONSCIOUSNE