How to Measure Procedural Knowledge for Solving Biodiversity and Climate Change Challenges

被引:10
作者
Richter-Beuschel, Lisa [1 ]
Grass, Ingo [2 ]
Boegeholz, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Goettingen, Dept Biol Educ, Waldweg 26, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Goettingen, Dept Agroecol, Grisebachstr 6, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
来源
EDUCATION SCIENCES | 2018年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
teacher education; education for sustainable development (ESD); Delphi survey; procedural knowledge; biodiversity; climate change;
D O I
10.3390/educsci8040190
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To cope with biodiversity and climate change challenges, Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) needs to emphasize knowledge that considers multiple perspectives. Optimizing teacher education requires knowledge about the prerequisites of student teachers. The latter includes content knowledge with respect to Sustainable Development (SD). Apart from situational and conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge (containing solution strategies) is of special interest, but it is much more difficult to measure. Thus, this study aims at developing a refined procedure to measure SD-relevant procedural knowledge and to define a measure for such knowledge, including a suitable benchmark for its evaluation. As SD-relevant knowledge, the SD challenges biodiversity loss and climate change were focused on. For operationalizing these challenges, the highly relevant contexts insects and pollination and peatland use were chosen. For both SD challenges and contexts, potential solution strategies were identified by a literature review. A procedure was then tested to measure procedural knowledge. The procedure includes a two-round expert survey (Delphi approach) with an in-between think-aloud study with student teachers. The described innovative procedure resulted in a measure (18 items) to assess procedural knowledge of student teachers via effectiveness estimations of provided solution strategies. This measure contains procedural knowledge items that are related to prior presented scenarios regarding the two contexts and a benchmark to evaluate these items. The benchmark derives from the second round of the Delphi study. The procedure and the developed final instrument include expertise from multiple disciplines such as ESD, SD, biodiversity, insect and pollination, climate change and peatland use. The sophisticated procedure can be transferred to challenging measurement developments. Furthermore, the measure provided for SD-relevant knowledge can be applied to other target groups in upper secondary and in higher education within ESD.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [31] Gayford C., 2000, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V6, P347, DOI [10.1080/713664696, DOI 10.1080/713664696]
  • [32] RT Delphi: An efficient, "round-less" almost real time Delphi method
    Gordon, T
    Pease, A
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2006, 73 (04) : 321 - 333
  • [33] Grasel C., 2000, OKOLOGISCHE KOMPETEN
  • [34] Grube Y., 2018, THESIS
  • [35] Hader M, 2002, DELPHI BEFRAGUNGEN A
  • [36] Hellberg-Rode G., 2014, Z GEOGRAPHIEDIDAKTIK, V4, P257
  • [37] Hellberg-Rode G., 2016, Z FU R DIDAKTIK BIOL, V20, P1, DOI [10.4119/UNIBI/zdb-v20-i1-330, DOI 10.4119/UNIBI/ZDB-V20]
  • [38] A Common Pesticide Decreases Foraging Success and Survival in Honey Bees
    Henry, Mickael
    Beguin, Maxime
    Requier, Fabrice
    Rollin, Orianne
    Odoux, Jean-Francois
    Aupinel, Pierrick
    Aptel, Jean
    Tchamitchian, Sylvie
    Decourtye, Axel
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 336 (6079) : 348 - 350
  • [39] Trait-Specific Responses of Wild Bee Communities to Landscape Composition, Configuration and Local Factors
    Hopfenmueller, Sebastian
    Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
    Holzschuh, Andrea
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [40] Kaiser F., 2000, KLUFT ZWISCHEN WISSE, P51