Usefulness of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Korean Revised Version in Screening for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition Alcohol Use Disorder among College Students

被引:4
作者
Kim, Sun-Jin [1 ]
Kim, Jong-Sung [1 ]
Kim, Sung-Soo [1 ]
Jung, Jin-Kyu [1 ]
Yoon, Seok-Joon [1 ]
Lee, Jung-Yoon [1 ]
Kim, Ji-Han [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Res Inst Med Sci, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
Alcohols; Screening; Diagnosis; College; Students;
D O I
10.4082/kjfm.17.0042
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: There is a distinction in alcohol consumption behavior between adults and college students. This study aims to verify the usability and the optimal cutoff point of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Korean revised version (AUDIT-KR) for screening alcohol use disorder in college students when the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM), 5th edition diagnostic criteria is applied. Methods: A total of 922 college students living in Daejeon were enrolled and divided into two groups based on how many items they corresponded to among DSM-5 alcohol use disorder diagnostic criteria: those who corresponded to >= 2 of the 11 items were classified into the patient group (107 males, 89 females) while the others into the control group (311 males, 415 females). The participants were evaluated using AUDIT-KR to find the optimal cutoff point for screening alcohol use disorder, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: The mean +/- standard deviation scores in the AUDIT-KR were 12.76 +/- 7.27, 10.72 +/- 4.62 for males and females, respectively, in the patient group. In contrast, in the control group the scores were 6.26 +/- 5.23 and 3.95 +/- 3.59 in males and females, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) regarding alcohol use disorder screening by AUDIT-KR was 0.768 (0.715-0.821) and 0.883 (0.848-0.919) for males and females, respectively. The optimal cutoff point of alcohol use disorder for males was > 9, sensitivity 64.49%, and specificity 76.85%. The optimal cutoff point for females was > 6, sensitivity 82.02%, and specificity 80.48%. Conclusion: This study suggested that AUDIT-KR can be used as a screening tool for alcohol use disorder in groups of college students when DSM-5 diagnosis criteria are applied.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 339
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[2]  
Babor T., 2001, AUDIT ALCOHOL USE DI
[3]  
Chun Sung-Soo, 2005, J Prev Med Public Health, V38, P307
[4]   Binge Drinking in Young Adults: Data, Definitions, and Determinants [J].
Courtney, Kelly E. ;
Polich, John .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2009, 135 (01) :142-156
[5]   Another look at heavy episodic drinking and alcohol use disorders among college and noncollege youth [J].
Dawson, DA ;
Grant, BF ;
Stinson, FS ;
Chou, PS .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2004, 65 (04) :477-488
[6]   Differences in the Profiles of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorders: Implications for Clinicians [J].
Dawson, Deborah A. ;
Goldstein, Rise B. ;
Grant, Bridget F. .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 37 :E305-E313
[7]   Heavy drinking on Canadian campuses [J].
Gliksman, L ;
Adlaf, EM ;
Demers, A ;
Newton-Taylor, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2003, 94 (01) :17-21
[8]   Performance of the AUDIT in Detecting DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorders in College Students [J].
Hagman, Brett T. .
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2016, 51 (11) :1521-1528
[9]   The Fast Alcohol Screening Test [J].
Hodgson, R ;
Alwyn, T ;
John, B ;
Thom, B ;
Smith, A .
ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 2002, 37 (01) :61-66
[10]   Reliability and Validity of Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Korean Revised Version for Screening At-risk Drinking and Alcohol Use Disorders [J].
Kim, Chang-Gi ;
Kim, Jong Sung ;
Jung, Jin-Gyu ;
Kim, Sung-Soo ;
Yoon, Seok-Joon ;
Suh, Hae-Sun .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 35 (01) :2-10