U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports and America's Foreign Policy Interests

被引:2
|
作者
Chanis, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, Grad Sch, Polit Sci, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
energy security; environmentalism; fracking; international trade; liquefied natural gas; natural gas;
D O I
10.1080/10803920.2012.742409
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The export of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the United States to other countries has significant foreign policy ramifications. Given the uncertain impact of such exports, it is not surprising that the U.S. administration has equivocated on various permitting decisions. However, in December 2012 or shortly thereafter, the Department of Energy is expected to release a study analyzing and evaluating many of the trade-offs involved in such exports. Unless this report conclusively demonstrates that (1) LNG exports would cause significant damage to U.S. residential and industrial consumers and (2) that higher domestic natural gas prices would not be more than compensated for through the gains of international trade, the administration should permit the construction of at least three or four more LNG export terminals. Such a permitting approach would not greatly change the existing domestic natural gas market, and it would allow the government to observe how the markets and their participants react to the change. Besides the probable benefits accruing to the United States through increased trade, such a change would bring a number of other foreign policy benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 334
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating the potential effects of U.S. LNG exports on global natural gas markets
    Moryadee, Seksun
    Gabriel, Steven A.
    Avetisyan, Hakob G.
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2014, 2 (3-4) : 273 - 288
  • [2] Natural Gas and U.S. Economic Activity
    Arora, Vipin
    Lieskovsky, Jozef
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03) : 167 - 182
  • [3] The future of U.S. natural gas production, use, and trade
    Paltsev, Sergey
    Jacoby, Henry D.
    Reilly, John M.
    Ejaz, Qudsia J.
    Morris, Jennifer
    O'Sullivan, Francis
    Rausch, Sebastian
    Winchester, Niven
    Kragha, Oghenerume
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (09) : 5309 - 5321
  • [4] The Shale Gas Revolution: U.S. and EU Policy and Research Agendas
    Boersma, Tim
    Johnson, Corey
    REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2012, 29 (04) : 570 - 576
  • [5] The Diffusion of Electrification Policy in U.S. Local Governments: A Case Study of Bellingham's "Gas Ban"
    Hazboun, Shawn
    Dixon, Erin
    CASE STUDIES IN THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [6] Scenarios for Russia's natural gas exports to 2050
    Paltsev, Sergey
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 42 : 262 - 270
  • [7] State regulation of unconventional gas development in the U.S.: An empirical evaluation
    Zirogiannis, Nikolaos
    Alcorn, Jessica
    Rupp, John
    Carley, Sanya
    Graham, John D.
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 11 : 142 - 154
  • [9] Positive notes appear in U.S. gas processing
    Haun, R.R., 1600, (88):
  • [10] Turkey's natural gas policy
    Hacisalihoglu, Bilge
    ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (06) : 1867 - 1872