The Reliability of Maitland's Irritability Judgments in Patients with Low Back Pain

被引:18
作者
Barakatt, Edward T. [1 ]
Romano, Patrick S. [2 ]
Riddle, Daniel L. [3 ]
Beckett, Laurel A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Phys Therapy, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Davis Div Gen Med, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Evaluation; Irritability; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Spine; Maitland;
D O I
10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.135
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Maitland's construct of musculoskeletal pain irritability is widely used by physical therapists but has not been defined to the extent that its measurement properties can be tested. The purpose of this study was to examine the inter-rater reliability of physical therapists' irritability judgments during application to patients with low back pain (LBP). Eighty patients with LBP received two consecutive examinations at their initial clinic visit by two physical therapists. Patients reported pain location and intensity prior to each evaluation. Therapists judged subjects' LBP as irritable or non-irritable. Inter-rater agreement of physical therapist irritability judgments was moderate (kappa = 0.44, prevalence-adjusted kappa = 0.50). This level of reliability of therapists' LBP irritability judgments may be improved upon by development of an operational definition of pain irritability. Further research is needed to identify measures appropriate for inclusion in an operational definition of pain irritability and to assess the value of making pain irritability judgments in evidence-based physical therapy practice.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 140
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint [J].
Arab, Amir Massoud ;
Abdollahi, Iraj ;
Joghataei, Mohammad Taghi ;
Golafshani, Zahra ;
Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2009, 14 (02) :213-221
[2]  
Banks KEK., 2001, MAITLANDS VERTEBRAL
[3]  
Barakatt E, 2003, 14 INT WORLD C PHYS
[4]   BIAS, PREVALENCE AND KAPPA [J].
BYRT, T ;
BISHOP, J ;
CARLIN, JB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (05) :423-429
[5]   Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain [J].
Childs, JD ;
Piva, SR ;
Fritz, JM .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) :1331-1334
[6]   Physiotherapists' pain beliefs and their influence on the management of patients with chronic low back pain [J].
Daykin, AR ;
Richardson, B .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (07) :783-795
[7]  
Doody C, 2002, PHYSIOTHER, V88, P258, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61417-4, 10.1016/Soo31-9406(05)61417-4, DOI 10.1016/SOO31-9406(05)61417-4]
[8]   Examining diagnostic tests: An evidence-based perspective [J].
Fritz, JM ;
Wainner, RS .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2001, 81 (09) :1546-1564
[9]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL FOR EVALUATION OF FITNESS PROGRAM FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
FROST, H ;
MOFFETT, JAK ;
MOSER, JS ;
FAIRBANK, JCT .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6973) :151-154
[10]   Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity [J].
Hoehler, FK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (05) :499-503