CHRONOTHERAPY WITH 5-FLUOROURACIL AND FOLINIC ACID IN ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA - RESULTS OF A CHRONOPHARMACOLOGIC PHASE-I TRIAL

被引:0
作者
ADLER, S
LANG, S
LANGENMAYER, I
EIBLEIBESFELDT, B
RUMP, W
EMMERICH, B
HALLEK, M
机构
[1] UNIV MUNICH,KLINIKUM INNENSTADT,MED KLIN,D-80336 MUNICH,GERMANY
[2] UNIV MUNICH,KLINIKUM INNENSTADT,CHIRURG KLIN,D-80336 MUNICH,GERMANY
关键词
CHRONOTHERAPY; CHRONOPHARMACOLOGY; CIRCADIAN; 5-FLUOROURACIL; FOLINIC ACID; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; TOXICITY; PHASE I;
D O I
10.1002/1097-0142(19940615)73:12<2905::AID-CNCR2820731206>3.0.CO;2-J
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Chronotherapy with antineoplastic drugs is a rather new strategy of reducing cytotoxic side effects. Because the circadian timing of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was reported to result in a higher efficacy and lower toxicity, the authors conducted a chronopharmacologic Phase I trial with 5-FU and folinic acid (FA). Methods. Eight patients with advanced colorectal cancer received 5-FU (initial dose of 500 mg/m(2)/day) and FA (20 mg/m(2)/day) as a continuous intravenous infusion over 5 consecutive days. Using a portable, ambulatory drug delivery system, 75% of the daily dose of 5-FU and FA were given from 0h00-7h00, and the remaining 25% from 7h00-24h00. Treatment courses were repeated after 28 days. Dose escalations of 250 mg/m(2)/day of 5-FU and 10 mg/m(2)/day of FA per course were performed in the absence of any toxicity greater than WHO (World Health Organization) grade 2. Results. Dose-limiting toxicity WHO grade 3 was observed at a dose of 750 mg/m(2)/day of 5-FU and 30 mg/m(2)/day of FA in five, and 1000 mg/m(2)/day of 5-FU and 40 mg/m(2)/day of FA in two patients, respectively. One patient tolerated 1000 mg/m(2)/day of 5-FU and 40 mg/m(2)/day of FA, but the treatment was stopped before further dose escalation because of rapid disease progression. Mucositis was the dose-limiting toxicity in seven patients and diarrhea in two. Disease stabilization occurred in three patients and disease progression in five. Compared with conventional Phase I/II trials using a 5-day infusion regimen, the maximal tolerated dose of 5-FU and FA was slightly higher but significantly lower than in a chronotherapeutic trial that used a different, sinusoidal mode of drug application. Conclusion. Based on these results, the authors feel justified to caution that the circadian timing of 5-FU plus FA may not always allow the safe application of high dose levels. Future Phase I/II studies need to define whether specific drug delivery systems or schedules are necessary for chronotherapy with 5-FU and FA in patients with colorectal carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:2905 / 2912
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
ANDERSON N, 1992, CANCER, V70, P998
[2]  
ANDERSON N, 1989, CANCER, V63, P233, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890115)63:2<233::AID-CNCR2820630205>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-E
[4]  
ARBRUCK SG, 1989, CANCER, V63, P1036
[5]   A PHASE-II STUDY OF WEEKLY 24-HOUR INFUSION WITH HIGH-DOSE FLUOROURACIL WITH LEUCOVORIN IN COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
ARDALAN, B ;
CHUA, L ;
TIAN, EM ;
REDDY, R ;
SRIDHAR, K ;
BENEDETTO, P ;
RICHMAN, S ;
LEGASPI, A ;
WALDMAN, S ;
MORRELL, L ;
FEUN, L ;
SAVARAJ, N ;
LIVINGSTONE, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (04) :625-630
[6]  
BERGER SH, 1984, MOL PHARMACOL, V25, P303
[7]  
CANON C, 1992, BIOL RHYTHMS CLIN LA, P635
[8]   PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF FLUOROURACIL VERSUS FLUOROURACIL AND HIGH-DOSE CONTINUOUS INFUSION LEUCOVORIN CALCIUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED MEASURABLE COLORECTAL-CANCER IN PATIENTS PREVIOUSLY UNEXPOSED TO CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
DOROSHOW, JH ;
MULTHAUF, P ;
LEONG, L ;
MARGOLIN, K ;
LITCHFIELD, T ;
AKMAN, S ;
CARR, B ;
BERTRAND, M ;
GOLDBERG, D ;
BLAYNEY, D ;
ODUJINRIN, O ;
DELAP, R ;
SHUSTER, J ;
NEWMAN, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (03) :491-501
[9]   The classification of cancer of the rectum [J].
Dukes, CE .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND BACTERIOLOGY, 1932, 35 (03) :323-332
[10]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF FLUOROURACIL AND FOLINIC ACID IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
ERLICHMAN, C ;
FINE, S ;
WONG, A ;
ELHAKIM, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (03) :469-475