A COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION TO AUTOMATED INSPECTION DEVICE SELECTION PROBLEMS USING ELECTRE METHODS

被引:14
作者
Chatterjee, Prasenjit [1 ]
Mondal, Suprakash [2 ]
Chakraborty, Shankar [3 ]
机构
[1] MCKV Inst Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Howrah 711204, India
[2] Mallabhum Inst Technol, Dept Prod Engn, Bishnupur 722122, India
[3] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, Kolkata 700032, India
关键词
Automated inspection device selection; Comparative analysis; ELECTRE II; IS; III;
D O I
10.14716/ijtech.v5i2.410
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Selection of an automated inspection device for an explicit industrial application is one of the most challenging problems in the current manufacturing environment. It has become more and more complicated due to increasing complexity, advanced features and facilities that are endlessly being integrated into the devices by different manufacturers. Selection of inspection devices plays a significant role in a manufacturing system for cost effectiveness and improved productivity. This paper focuses on the application of a very popular Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) tool, i.e. ELimination and Et Choice Translating REality (ELECTRE) for solving an automated inspection device selection problem in a discrete manufacturing environment. Using a sample case study from the published literature, this paper attempts to show how different variants of the ELECTRE method, namely ELECTRE II, IS, III, IV and TRI can be suitably applied in choosing the most efficient alternative that accounts for both the decision maker's intervention and other technical elements. Using different ELECTRE methods, a list of all the possible choices from the best to the worst suitable devices is obtained while taking into account different selection attributes. The ranking performance of these methods is also compared with that of the past researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 208
页数:16
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A comparative study of preference dominance-based approaches for selection of industrial robots [J].
Chatterjee, P. ;
Mondal, S. ;
Chakraborty, S. .
ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 9 (01) :5-20
[2]  
Chatterjee P., 2010, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V1, P41
[3]  
Chatterjee P., 2014, INT J IND ENG COMPUT, V5, P1
[4]  
Chatterjee P., 2011, J IND ENG INT, V7, P61
[5]   Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods [J].
Chatterjee, Prasenjit ;
Athawale, Vijay Manikrao ;
Chakraborty, Shankar .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2010, 26 (05) :483-489
[6]   Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods [J].
Chatterjee, Prasenjit ;
Athawale, Vijay Manikrao ;
Chakraborty, Shankar .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2009, 30 (10) :4043-4053
[7]   A new method for tool steel materials selection under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, SM .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1997, 92 (03) :265-274
[8]   Multicriteria decision methods: An attempt to evaluate and unify [J].
Cho, KT .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2003, 37 (9-10) :1099-1119
[9]  
Cliville V., 2006, J MODELLING MANAGEME, V8, P348
[10]   An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions [J].
Figueira, Jose Rui ;
Greco, Salvatore ;
Roy, Bernard ;
Slowinski, Roman .
JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2013, 20 (1-2) :61-85