EVALUATION OF CHINA'S BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE BY EUROPEAN THINK TANKS (2013-2017)

被引:1
|
作者
Muratshina, Kseniya G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ural Fed Univ, Ekaterinburg, Russia
来源
VOLGOGRADSKII GOSUDARSTVENNYI UNIVERSITET-VESTNIK-SERIYA 4-ISTORIYA REGIONOVEDENIE MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA | 2018年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
China; The Belt and Road Initiative; Europe; sinology; think tanks;
D O I
10.15688/jvolsu4.2018.4.12
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
This paper presents the analysis of the leading European think tanks' research on The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) proposed by the Chinese government in 2013. We point out the most specific assessments and main trends within the existing approaches to the mentioned initiative. Since Russia is a direct participant of this project, the comparison of Russian and foreign sinologists' views seems to be important for working out a complex strategy of Russia's participation in the Chinese project with a clear understanding of China's policy and possible advantages for our country. The study has been carried out with the help of comparative analysis and historical genesis approach, which let us understand and formulate the major points of the European experts' evaluation. The selection of the think tanks, whose publications have been investigated, is conditioned by the area of their activity - international and oriental studies. The paper consequently discusses the collective monographs, reports, brochures and commentaries, issued by the think tanks of Western, Central and Eastern Europe. The research results show that the majority of European sinologists view The Belt and Road Initiative not as a form of aid to foreign countries, but as an entirely commercial initiative serving the Chinese interests. The main reasons for BRI implementation, put forward by the EU experts include energy security, the need for the development of China's western regions, the purpose to get better access to natural resources in different regions of the world, as well as the yuan internationalization Furthermore, BRI is definitely viewed by the European experts as a project, competing with other integration initiatives in Eurasia, primarily with the Eurasian Economic Union. Finally, the paper gives the recommendations, given by the European think tanks to their governments. In particular, the main idea is to develop the most sophisticated and scrutinized expert evaluation of all BRI projects entered by the European countries, and to differentiate among China-oriented initiatives and mutually beneficial ones.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 147
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Role of International Engagement in Greening China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Gong, Weila
    Lewis, Joanna I.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2023, 32 (07) : 1208 - 1230
  • [32] CHINA'S BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE: A VIEW FROM A MAHATHIRIST IMAGINARY
    Khoo, Boo Teik
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 66 (01) : 293 - 312
  • [33] Russia–Ukraine crisis: China’s Belt Road Initiative at the crossroads
    Alvaro Mendez
    Francisco Javier Forcadell
    Kateryna Horiachko
    Asian Business & Management, 2022, 21 : 488 - 496
  • [34] Unraveling the Belt and Road Initiative: China’s “Building Out” Strategy
    Jonas Gamso
    Michael H. Moffett
    East Asia, 2023, 40 : 21 - 36
  • [35] Credit rating agencies' views on China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Ioannou, Stefanos
    Keenan, Liam
    Wojcik, Dariusz
    EURASIAN GEOGRAPHY AND ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [36] New challenges of the Belt and Road Initiative under China?s "3060" carbon target
    Wang, Xin
    Liu, Yunqi
    Bi, Jun
    Liu, Miaomiao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 376
  • [37] A Review on the Position of South Caucasus in China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Aydin, Mustafa
    Berdas, Gulmire
    KHAZAR JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2023, 26 (04): : 7 - 33
  • [38] China's Belt and Road Initiative: Reducing or Increasing the World Uncertainties?
    Siu, Ricardo C. S.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2019, 53 (02) : 571 - 578
  • [39] China's Belt and Road Initiative Economic Development or Strategic Statecraft?
    Wu, Jingwen
    ASIAN SURVEY, 2024, 64 (06) : 973 - 1003
  • [40] Rethinking Soft Power in Light of China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Yagci, Mustafa
    ULUSLARARASI ILISKILER-INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2018, 15 (57): : 67 - 78