BIODYNAMIC RESPONSE OF THE HAND-ARM SYSTEM TO VIBRATION FROM AN IMPACT HAMMER AND A GRINDER

被引:69
作者
KIHLBERG, S
机构
[1] Division of Work and Environmental Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health
关键词
FREQUENCY WEIGHTING; DISSIPATED POWER; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; IMPACT; IMPEDANCE; HAND-ARM VIBRATION; HARMONIC VIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/0169-8141(94)00060-G
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The dynamic response of the hand/arm system due to exposure of two types of vibrations, one from an impact hammer and one from a grinder, were studied. The aim of the investigation was to study whether the dynamic response was dependent of the type of exposure and/or the frequency of the vibration. The dynamic responses studied were driving point impedance, transfer function from handle to finger, wrist and elbow. The energy per time (dissipated power) absorbed in the hand-arm system as well as the influences of grip and push forces on the impedance were also studied. When grip and push forces were kept constant, no differences were found, in either transfer function or driving-point impedance, between impact and harmonic exposure. Increasing grip as well as push forces increased the impedance, both in resonance frequency and in magnitude. This means that the dissipated power depends on both (1) frequency contents of the vibration and (2) forces (grip and push). Exposures with predominantly lower frequencies (< 50 Hz) caused a greater load on the elbow and shoulder joints than exposures with higher frequencies (greater than or equal to 100 Hz). Up to about 250 Hz, the finger acts like a rigid body. When people exert force they tighten their muscles and this means that their hand-arm acts like a ''stiffer spring'' and thus increases the resonance frequency. The hand-arm system is also a non-linear system. Relevance to industry The paper discusses the dynamic response of the hand-arm system to exposure of vibration from an impact tool (impact hammer) and a non-impact tool (grinder). Factors like frequency content of the vibration, and grip and push forces influence the energy absorbed in the hand-arm system. Whenever possible, a tool that requires low grip and push forces should be used. This can be helpful in choosing the proper tool for the job.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BURSTROM L, 1990, 5TH INT C HAND ARM V, P43
[2]  
BURSTROM L, 1993, HAND ARM VIBRATION
[3]   VIBRATION FROM RIVETING TOOLS IN THE FREQUENCY-RANGE 6 HZ-10 MHZ AND RAYNAUDS-PHENOMENON [J].
DANDANELL, R ;
ENGSTROM, K .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1986, 12 (04) :338-342
[4]   EXPOSURE CONDITIONS AND RAYNAUDS-PHENOMENON AMONG RIVETERS IN THE AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY [J].
ENGSTROM, K ;
DANDANELL, R .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1986, 12 (04) :293-295
[5]  
FINNVEDEN S, 1988, 1988 RES REP, P8
[6]  
Fung YC, 1981, BIOMECHANICS
[7]   BONE AND JOINT PATHOLOGY IN WORKERS USING HAND-HELD VIBRATING TOOLS - AN OVERVIEW [J].
GEMNE, G ;
SARASTE, H .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1987, 13 (04) :290-300
[8]  
Griffin M.J., 1990, HDB HUMAN VIBRATION, DOI DOI 10.1121/1.401606
[9]   EFFECTS OF GRIP AND PUSH FORCES ON THE ACUTE RESPONSE OF THE HAND-ARM SYSTEM UNDER VIBRATING CONDITIONS [J].
HARTUNG, E ;
DUPUIS, H ;
SCHEFFER, M .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1993, 64 (06) :463-467
[10]  
LEY FX, 1988, EFFECTS VIBRATION MA