Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words A regression study across tasks and modalities

被引:121
作者
Baayen, R. Harald [1 ,2 ]
Wurm, Lee H. [3 ]
Aycock, Joanna [3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1075/ml.2.3.06baa
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
In this study we examine the word recognition process for low-frequency morphologically complex words. One goal of the study was to replicate and expand upon findings suggesting facilitative effects of morphological relatives of a target word. A second goal was to demonstrate the need for a reinterpretation of root and surface frequency effects, which traditionally have been taken as indicators of parsing-based and memory-driven processing, respectively. In a first study, we used the same stimuli across auditory and visual lexical decision and naming. Mixed-effects statistical modeling revealed that surface frequency was a robust predictor of RTs even in the very low end of the distribution, but root frequency was not. Also, the nature of the similarity between a target and its lexical competitors is crucial. Measures gauging the influence of morphological relatives of the target were facilitative, while measures gauging the influence of words related only in form were inhibitory. A second study analyzing data from the English Lexicon Project, for a large sample of words from across the full frequency range, supports these conclusions. An information-theoretical analysis of root and surface frequency explains why surface frequency must be the most important predictor, with only a marginal role for root frequency.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 463
页数:45
相关论文
共 104 条
[91]   MEMORY REPRESENTATION FOR MORPHOLOGICALLY RELATED WORDS [J].
STANNERS, RF ;
NEISER, JJ ;
HERNON, WP ;
HALL, R .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1979, 18 (04) :399-412
[92]  
Tabak W., 2005, LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.529, DOI 10.1515/9783110197549]
[93]   Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect [J].
Taft, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 57 (04) :745-765
[94]   LEXICAL STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF PREFIXED WORDS [J].
TAFT, M ;
FORSTER, KI .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1975, 14 (06) :638-647
[95]   INTERACTIVE-ACTIVATION AS A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING MORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSING [J].
TAFT, M .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1994, 9 (03) :271-294
[96]   RECOGNITION OF AFFIXED WORDS AND THE WORD-FREQUENCY EFFECT [J].
TAFT, M .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1979, 7 (04) :263-272
[97]   Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account [J].
Taylor, TE ;
Lupker, SJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (01) :117-138
[98]   Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model [J].
Ullman, MT .
COGNITION, 2004, 92 (1-2) :231-270
[99]   Activation of embedded words in spoken word recognition [J].
Vroomen, J ;
deGelder, B .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1997, 23 (03) :710-720
[100]   Dynamics of the auditory comprehension of prefixed words Cohort entropies and Conditional Root Uniqueness Points [J].
Wurm, Lee H. ;
Ernestus, Mirjam ;
Schreuder, Robert ;
Baayen, R. Harald .
MENTAL LEXICON, 2006, 1 (01) :125-146