RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL EVALUATING CARDIOVASCULAR SCREENING AND INTERVENTION IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - PRINCIPAL RESULTS OF BRITISH FAMILY HEART-STUDY

被引:170
作者
WOOD, DA
KINMONTH, AL
DAVIES, GA
YARWOOD, J
THOMPSON, SG
PYKE, SDM
KOK, Y
CRAMB, R
LEGUEN, C
MARTEAU, TM
DURRINGTON, PN
机构
[1] UNIV SOUTHAMPTON,SOUTHAMPTON SO9 5NH,HANTS,ENGLAND
[2] UNIV LONDON LONDON SCH HYG & TROP MED,MED STAT UNIT,LONDON WC1E 7HT,ENGLAND
[3] UNIV BIRMINGHAM,WOLFSON RES LABS,BIRMINGHAM B15 2TT,W MIDLANDS,ENGLAND
[4] UNITED MED & DENT SCH GUYS & ST THOMAS HOSP,WELLCOME PSYCHOL & GENET RES GRP,LONDON,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.308.6924.313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective-To measure the change in cardiovascular risk factors achievable in families over one year by a cardiovascular screening and lifestyle intervention in general practice. Design-Randomised controlled trial in 26 general practices in 13 towns in Britain. Subjects-12472 men aged 40-59 and their partners (7460 men and 5012 women) identified by household. Intervention-Nurse led programme using a family centred approach with follow up according to degree of risk. Main outcome measures-After one year the pairs of practices were compared for differences in (a) total coronary (Dundee) risk score and (b) cigarette smoking, weight, blood pressure, and random blood cholesterol and glucose concentrations. Results-In men the overall reduction in coronary risk score was 16% (95% confidence interval 11% to 21%) in the intervention practices at one year. This was partitioned between systolic pressure (7%), smoking (5%), and cholesterol concentration (4%). The reduction for women was similar. For both sexes reported cigarette smoking at one year was lower by about 4%, systolic pressure by 7 mm Hg, diastolic pressure by 3 mm Hg, weight by 1 kg, and cholesterol concentration by 0.1 mmol/l, but there was no shift in glucose concentration. Weight, blood pressure, and cholesterol concentration showed the greatest difference at the top of the distribution. If maintained long term the differences in risk factors achieved would mean only a 12% reduction in risk of coronary events. Conclusions-As most general practices are not using such an intensive programme the changes in coronary risk factors achieved by the voluntary health promotion package for primary care are likely to be even smaller. The government's screening policy cannot be justified by these results.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 320
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条