BIODISTRIBUTION AND TOXICITY OF MR IMAGING CONTRAST-MEDIA

被引:102
作者
OKSENDAL, AN
HALS, PA
机构
[1] Nycomed Imaging As, Oslo, N-0401, PO Box 4220 Torshov
来源
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | 1993年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST MEDIA; TOXICITY; GADOLINIUM; IRON; MANGANESE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880030128
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
SIGNAL INTENSITY on a magnetic resonance image is mainly determined by proton density and T1 and T2. Image contrast, described as the difference in signal intensity between two tissues, is dependent on a number of physical parameters and can be altered by changing these parameters. Contrast agents are pharmaceuticals that can accentuate the difference in signal intensity between two adjacent tissue compartments by directly interfering with the proton relaxation times in one more than in the other. Such agents are designed with the purpose of improving image contrast between normal and abnormal tissues and may enhance the contrast positively or negatively, depending on their relative T1, T2, or T2* effects. Effective MR imaging contrast agents include paramagnetic (metal ions such as gadolinium. manganese, dysprosium, iron; free radicals; nitrous oxides), magnetic (superparamagnetic or ferromagnetic iron oxide particles), or diamagnetic (substances that displace hydrogen nuclei such as gases, deuterated water, perfluorocarbons) materials. The clinical effect of an MR imaging contrast medium is determined not only by the contrast-enhancing properties of the compound but also by its pharmacokinetic properties, which determine where the agent is distributed in the body and the length of time adequate concentrations are maintained in target organs. Furthermore, it is of crucial importance that the drug be well tolerated when given in doses necessary to achieve the clinical effect.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Weinmann HJ, Brasch RC, Press WR, Wesbey GE, Characteristics of gadolinium‐DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent, AJR, 142, pp. 619-624, (1984)
  • [2] Nell G, Rummel W, Pharmacology of intestinal permeation, Handbook of experimental pharmacology Vol 70. Part II, (1984)
  • [3] Wedeking P, Tweedle M, Comparison of the biodistri‐bution of <sup>153</sup>Gd‐labeled Gd(DTPA)<sup>2</sup>‐, Gd(DOTA)<sup>−</sup>, and Gd(Acetate)<sub>n</sub> in mice, Nucl Med Biol, 15, pp. 395-402, (1988)
  • [4] Hals PA, Hogset A, Disposition of gadolinium after high and low doses of gadolinium chloride to mice: organ distribution, elimination, and subcellular localization in liver cells (abstr), Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1990, (1990)
  • [5] Barnhart JL, Kuhnert N, Bakan DA, Berk RN, Biodistri‐bution of GdCl<sub>3</sub> and Gd‐DTPA and their influence on proton magnetic relaxation in rat tissues, Magn Reson Imaging, 5, pp. 221-231, (1987)
  • [6] Cacheris WP, Quay SC, Rocklage S, The relationship between thermodynamics and the toxicity of gadolinium complexes, Magn Reson Imaging, 8, pp. 467-481, (1990)
  • [7] Meyer D, Schaefer M, Doucet D, Advances in macrocyclic gadolinium complexes as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents, Invest Radiol, 25, (1990)
  • [8] Wedeking P, Kumar K, Tweedle MF, Dissociation of gadolinium chelates in mice: relationship to chemical characteristics, Magn Reson Imaging, 10, pp. 641-648, (1992)
  • [9] Chang CA, Sieving PF, Watson AD, Et al., Ionic versus non‐ionic MR imaging contrast media: operational definitions, JMRI, 2, pp. 95-98, (1992)
  • [10] Kaskoat T, Ulrich K, Quantification of dechelation of gadopentetate dimeglumine in rats, Arzneim Forsch/Drug Res, 42, 1, pp. 869-876, (1992)