Robotic surgery in gynecology

被引:49
作者
Alkatout, Ibrahim [1 ]
Mettler, Liselotte [1 ]
Maass, Nicolai [1 ]
Ackermann, Johannes [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
关键词
Robotic surgery; laparoscopy; gynecological oncology; surgical training; cost efficiency;
D O I
10.5152/jtgga.2016.16187
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Robotic surgery is the most dynamic development in the sector of minimally invasive operations currently. It should not be viewed as an alternative to laparoscopy, but as the next step in a process of technological evolution. The advancement of robotic surgery, in terms of the introduction of the Da Vinci Xi, permits the variable use of optical devices in all four trocars. Due to the new geometry of the "patient cart," an operation can be performed in all spatial directions without re-docking. Longer instruments and the markedly narrower mechanical elements of the "patient cart" provide greater flexibility as well as access similar to those of traditional laparoscopy. Currently, robotic surgery is used for a variety of indications in the treatment of benign gynecological diseases as well as malignant ones. Interdisciplinary cooperation and cooperation over large geographical distances have been rendered possible by telemedicine, and will ensure comprehensive patient care in the future by highly specialized surgery teams. In addition, the second operation console and the operation simulator constitute a new dimension in advanced surgical training. The disadvantages of robotic surgery remain the high costs of acquisition and maintenance as well as the laborious training of medical personnel before they are confident with using the technology.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 232
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Tubal reanastomosis: analysis of the results of 30 years of treatment
    Abelha, Melissa de Castro
    Costa, Rosaly Rulli
    Lopes, Vinicius Medina
    Vinhaes dos Reis, Rachel Costa
    Martins da Silva, Carla Maria
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2008, 30 (06): : 294 - 299
  • [2] Abo C, 2016, J GYNECOL OBSTET BIO
  • [3] Alkatout I, 2015, ZENTRALBL CHIR
  • [4] Safety and economical innovations regarding surgical treatment of fibroids
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    Mettler, Liselotte
    Guenther, Veronika
    Maass, Nicolai
    Eckmann-Scholz, Christel
    Elessawy, Mohamed
    Anapolski, Michael
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 25 (06) : 301 - 313
  • [5] Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Ayav, A
    Bresler, L
    Hubert, J
    Brunaud, L
    Boissel, P
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (09): : 1200 - 1203
  • [6] Robotic Tubal Anastomosis: Technical Aspects
    Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.
    Barakat, Ehab M.
    Falcone, Tommaso
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2011, 15 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [7] Boggess JF, 2008, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V199, pe1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.AJ0G.2008.08.012
  • [8] Analysis of disease recurrence and survival for women with uterine malignancies undergoing robotic surgery
    Brudie, Lorna A.
    Backes, Floor J.
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    Zhu, Xiang
    Finkler, Neil J.
    Bigsby, Glenn E.
    Cohn, David E.
    O'Malley, David
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    Holloway, Robert W.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 128 (02) : 309 - 315
  • [9] Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - A comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates
    Chan, John K.
    Gardner, Austin B.
    Taylor, Katie
    Thompson, Caroline A.
    Blansit, Kevin
    Yu, Xinhua
    Kapp, Daniel S.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 139 (02) : 300 - 305
  • [10] Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer
    Chen, Ching-Hui
    Chiu, Li-Hsuan
    Chen, Huang-Hui
    Chan, Cindy
    Liu, Wei-Min
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2016, 12 (02) : 268 - 275