Multisite Research Ethics Review: Problems and Potential Solutions

被引:0
|
作者
Ferguson, Aidan [1 ]
Master, Zubin [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Social Work, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[2] Alden March Bioeth Inst, Albany Med Coll, New York, NY USA
来源
BIOETHIQUEONLINE | 2016年 / 5卷
关键词
multisite research; human subject research; research ethics board; institutional review board; reciprocal review; centralized review; multisite ethics review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Large scale, multisite clinical research trials have been increasing in frequency. As it stands currently, a research project performed at multiple institutions requires ethics review at each institution. While local (institutional) review may be necessary in some instances, repetitive reviews may require unnecessary changes and not serve to further protect participants. Multiple ethics reviews of a single study have been shown to delay research and require, in some cases, significant resources in order to fulfill the requests of individual ethics boards. This literature review discusses the conceptual issues and outlines empirical research surrounding multisite ethics review from different jurisdictions, as well as alternative methods to streamline the ethics review process including reciprocal review, centralized review, and a proposed modification to the centralized review process.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Out of the frying pan? Streamlining the ethics review process of multisite qualitative research projects
    Iedema, Rick A. M.
    Allen, Suellen
    Britton, Kate
    Hor, Suyin
    AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2013, 37 (02) : 137 - 139
  • [2] Considerations for ethics in multisite research in paediatric palliative care
    Cadell, S.
    Ho, G.
    Jacques, L.
    Wilson, K.
    Davies, B.
    Steele, R.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 23 (03) : 274 - 275
  • [3] Ethics review of multisite studies: the difficult case of community-based Indigenous health research
    Studdert, David M.
    Vu, Tamara M.
    Fox, Sarah S.
    Anderson, Ian P.
    Keeffe, Jill E.
    Taylor, Hugh R.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2010, 192 (05) : 275 - 280
  • [4] Nonlinear Transformations in Organizational Research: Possible Problems and Potential Solutions
    Becker, Thomas E.
    Robertson, Melissa M.
    Vandenberg, Robert J.
    ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 22 (04) : 831 - 866
  • [5] Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
    Green, Jonathan M.
    Goodman, Polly
    Kirby, Aaron
    Cobb, Nichelle
    Bierer, Barbara E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [6] The goodness of ethics in research ethics review
    Rhodes, Rosamond
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 44 (07) : 489 - 490
  • [7] The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions
    Tsamados, Andreas
    Aggarwal, Nikita
    Cowls, Josh
    Morley, Jessica
    Roberts, Huw
    Taddeo, Mariarosaria
    Floridi, Luciano
    AI & SOCIETY, 2022, 37 (01) : 215 - 230
  • [8] The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions
    Andreas Tsamados
    Nikita Aggarwal
    Josh Cowls
    Jessica Morley
    Huw Roberts
    Mariarosaria Taddeo
    Luciano Floridi
    AI & SOCIETY, 2022, 37 : 215 - 230
  • [9] The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives
    Fitzgerald, Maureen H.
    Phillips, Paul A.
    Yule, Elisa
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 16 (04) : 377 - 395
  • [10] Use of focus groups in business ethics research: potential, problems and paths to progress
    Cowton, Christopher J.
    Downs, Yvonne
    BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2015, 24 : S54 - S66