Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Placement: A Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes Study

被引:110
作者
Walia, Gurjot S. [1 ]
Aston, Jeffrey [1 ]
Bello, Ricardo [1 ]
Mackert, Gina A. [1 ]
Pedreira, Rachel A. [1 ]
Cho, Brian H. [1 ]
Carl, Hannah M. [1 ]
Rada, Erin M. [1 ]
Rosson, Gedge D. [1 ]
Sacks, Justin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000001731
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Traditionally, tissue expanders (TEs) for breast reconstruction have been placed beneath the pectoralis major muscle with or without acellular dermal matrix. More recently, full acellular dermal matrix coverage has been described for prepectoral TE placement. Our study aims to explore differences in clinical and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes for prepectoral versus subpectoral TE breast reconstruction. Methods: We identified patients who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction with prepectoral or subpectoral TE placement between 2011 and 2015 and completed QOL surveys. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain and QOL scores. Secondary outcomes were clinical outcomes. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum test, chi-square test, and linear regression to compare outcomes. Postoperative follow-up for each patient was at least 60 days, except that of pain scores, which were at least 30 days. Mean age was 49 +/- 10 years. Results: Twenty-six prepectoral TE patients and 109 subpectoral TE patients met inclusion criteria. Pain scores were significantly lower at 12 hours, 1 day, 7 days, and 30 days postoperatively for the prepectoral group, compared with the subpectoral group, even after adjusting for confounding variables [PO12H: Sub-Pectoral (SP) median (interquartile range), 7 (5-8), Pre-Pectoral (PP), 5 (2.5-7.5), P value = 0.004; PO1D: SP, 5 (4-6), PP 3 (2-4), P value = < 0.001; PO7D: SP, 2 (0-4), PP, 0 (0-2), P value = 0.004; PO30D: SP, 0 (0-2), PP, 0 (0-0), P value = 0.039)]. BreastQ scores were not significantly different between study groups. RAND-36 Physical Health scores were lower among prepectoral TE patients. Conclusions: Prepectoral TE breast reconstruction presents an opportunity to improve upon current reconstructive methods and does result in significantly lower pain scores. The associated risks have yet to be fully described and are important considerations, as these prepectoral patients had lower physical health outcome scores.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   A Paradigm Shift in US Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates [J].
Albornoz, Claudia R. ;
Bach, Peter B. ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Disa, Joseph J. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
McCarthy, Colleen M. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Matros, Evan .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (01) :15-23
[2]  
American Cancer Society, BREAST CANC FACTS FI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 2013 PLAST SURG STAT
[4]   BREAST RECONSTRUCTION WITH A SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE EXPANDER FOLLOWED WITH A POLYURETHANE-COVERED SILICONE BREAST IMPLANT [J].
ARTZ, JS ;
DINNER, MI ;
SAMPLINER, J .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1988, 20 (06) :517-521
[5]   A Systematic Review and Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis of Outcomes following Direct-to-Implant versus Conventional Two-Stage Implant Reconstruction [J].
Basta, Marten N. ;
Gerety, Patrick A. ;
Serletti, Joseph M. ;
Kovach, Stephen J. ;
Fischer, John P. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 136 (06) :1135-1144
[6]   Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up [J].
Bernini, Marco ;
Calabrese, Claudio ;
Cecconi, Lorenzo ;
Santi, Caterina ;
Gjondedaj, Ulpjana ;
Roselli, Jenny ;
Nori, Jacopo ;
Fausto, Alfonso ;
Orzalesi, Lorenzo .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (12)
[7]   Interpreting Clinical Differences in BREAST-Q Scores: Minimal Important Difference [J].
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Klassen, Anne F. ;
Scott, Amie ;
Alderman, Amy ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (01) :173E-175E
[8]   A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Part 2. The Influence of Changing Mastectomy Patterns on Reconstructive Rate and Method [J].
Cemal, Yeliz ;
Albornoz, Claudia R. ;
Disa, Joseph J. ;
McCarthy, Colleen M. ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Matros, Evan .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (03) :320E-326E
[9]  
Edsander-Nord A, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V107, P1142
[10]   Breast reconstruction in the elderly: Preserving excellent quality of life [J].
Girotto, JA ;
Schreiber, J ;
Nahabedian, MY .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 50 (06) :572-578