Keeping Your Readers' Eyes on the Screen: An EyeTracking Study Comparing Sans Serif and Serif Typefaces

被引:26
作者
Josephson, Sheree [1 ]
机构
[1] Weber State Univ, Journalism & Visual Commun, Ogden, UT 84408 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/15551390801914595
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
An exploratory eye-tracking study was designed to compare the onscreen legibility of sans serif and serif typefaces. The typefaces selected for this study included the serif font Times New Roman and the sans serif font Arial-both originally designed for printing on paper-and the serif font Georgia and the sans serif font Verdana-both designed in recent years especially for reading onscreen. Six participants read four short news stories, each displayed in a different typeface, while their eye-movement behavior was recorded. Overall, Verdana performed best. Participants were able to read more quickly and experienced fewer regressions (backward movements) when the type was set in Verdana. They also expressed a strong preference for this font on the computer screen.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 79
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Bernard M., 2002, USABILITY NEWS, V4, P1
[2]  
Bernard M., 2001, USABILITY NEWS
[3]  
BERNARD M, 2001, P ACM SIGCHI C CHI 2, P175
[4]  
Bouma H, 1980, ERGONOMIC ASPECTS VI, P101
[5]  
Boyarski D., 1998, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, P87, DOI DOI 10.1145/274644.274658
[6]   READABILITY OF TEXT SCROLLED ON VISUAL-DISPLAY TERMINALS AS A FUNCTION OF WINDOW SIZE [J].
DUCHNICKY, RL ;
KOLERS, PA .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1983, 25 (06) :683-692
[7]   How physical text layout affects reading from screen [J].
Dyson, MC .
BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 23 (06) :377-393
[8]  
Geske J, 1996, ASS ED JOURN MASS CO
[9]   READING IS SLOWER FROM CRT DISPLAYS THAN FROM PAPER - ATTEMPTS TO ISOLATE A SINGLE-VARIABLE EXPLANATION [J].
GOULD, JD ;
ALFARO, L ;
BARNES, V ;
FINN, R ;
GRISCHKOWSKY, N ;
MINUTO, A .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1987, 29 (03) :269-299
[10]  
Horton W., 1990, DESIGNING WRITING ON