Cepstral analysis of normal and pathological voice in Spanish adults. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence in sustained vowels versus connected speech

被引:31
作者
Delgado-Hernandez, Jonathan [1 ]
Leon-Gomez, Nieves M. [2 ]
Izquierdo-Arteaga, Laura M. [1 ]
Llanos-Fumero, Yanira [1 ]
机构
[1] CREN Salud, Dept Logopedia, San Cristobal la Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Canarias, Unidad Logopedia, Serv Rehabil, San Cristobal la Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
来源
ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA | 2018年 / 69卷 / 03期
关键词
Acoustic analysis of voice; Dysphonia; Smoothed cepstra peak prominence; Praat;
D O I
10.1016/j.otorri.2017.05.006
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction and objectives: In recent years, the use of cepstral measures for acoustic evaluation of voice has increased. One of the most investigated parameters is smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPs). The objectives of this paper are to establish the usefulness of this acoustic measure in the objective evaluation of alterations of the voice in Spanish and to determine what type of voice sample (sustained vowels or connected speech) is the most sensitive in evaluating the severity of dysphonia. Method: Forty subjects participated in this study 40, 20 controls and 20 with dysphonia. Two voice samples were recorded for each subject (one sustained vowel/a/and four phonetically balanced sentences) and the CPPs was calculated using the Praat programme. Three raters perceptually evaluated the voice sample with the Grade parameter of GRABS scale. Results: Significantly lower values were found in the dysphonic voices, both for/a/ (t([38]) = 4.85, P < .000) and for phrases (t([38]) = 5,75, P < .000). In relation to the type of voice sample most suitable for evaluating the severity of voice alterations, a strong correlation was found with the acoustic-perceptual scale of CPPs calculated from connected speech (r(s) = -0.73) and moderate correlation with that calculated from the sustained vowel (r(s), = -0,56). Conclusion: The results of this preliminary study suggest that CPPs is a good measure to detect dysphonia and to objectively assess the severity of alterations in the voice. (C) 2017 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. and Sociedad Espanola de Otorrinolaringologia y Cirugia de Cabeza y Cuello. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 140
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Awan S. N., 2008, HDB CLIN LINGUISTICS, P347, DOI 10.1002/9781444301007.ch21
[2]   Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: A four-factor acoustic model [J].
Awan, SN ;
Roy, N .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2006, 20 (01) :35-49
[3]   Cepstral Analysis of Voice in Unilateral Adductor Vocal Fold Palsy [J].
Balasubramanium, Radish Kumar ;
Bhat, Jayashree S. ;
Fahim, Sahikha, III ;
Raju, Ria, III .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2011, 25 (03) :326-329
[4]  
Barsties B, 2017, J VOICE, V31
[5]   External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity [J].
Barsties, Ben ;
Maryn, Youri .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 125 (07) :571-583
[6]   The improvement of internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index [J].
Barsties, Ben ;
Maryn, Youri .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 36 (05) :647-656
[7]  
Boersma P., PRAAT DOING PHONETIC, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10072-018-3598-5
[8]   Use of Cepstral Analyses for Differentiating Normal From Dysphonic Voices: A Comparative Study of Connected Speech Versus Sustained Vowel in European Portuguese Female Speakers [J].
Brinca, Lilia F. ;
Batista, Ana Paula F. ;
Tavares, Ana Ines ;
Goncalves, Ilido C. ;
Moreno, Maria L. .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2014, 28 (03) :282-286
[9]  
Cecconello L., 2008, REV FASO, V15, P12
[10]  
Dejonckere P, 1996, ADV CLIN PHONETICS, V6, P217, DOI DOI 10.1075/SSPCL.6.13DEJ