Assessment of the chemical concentrations and the environmental risk of tank cleaning effluents in the Baltic Sea

被引:0
作者
Honkanen, Milja [1 ]
Hakkinen, Jani [1 ]
Posti, Antti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Ctr Maritime Studies, Heikinkatu 7, Kotka 48100, Finland
关键词
Tank cleaning effluents; Impact assessment; Marine environment; PEC/PNEC ratio; The Baltic Sea;
D O I
10.1007/s13437-013-0042-9
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The environmental risks of tank cleaning waters were evaluated in this study by conducting a risk assessment of five target chemicals (nonylphenol, phenol, sulphuric acid, styrene and xylenes) following EU risk assessment methodology in which the Predicted Environmental Concentrations (PECs) of the chemicals are determined and compared to their corresponding predicted no effect concentrations (PNECs). The results of the risk assessment demonstrated the importance of prewashing cargo tanks ashore before the main washing. Without prewashing the cargo tanks and discharging the generated prewashing effluents into reception facilities ashore, the PEC/PNEC ratios obtained for further washings exceed accepted levels regardless of the chemical and the quantity of chemical residue (15:50:300 l). In contrast, if the cargo tanks arc prewashed and the remaining prewash residues in the tanks are small (<= 15 l), the risk arising from tank cleaning effluents stays at accepted levels, and no harm is caused to aquatic organisms. When the prewash residue is around 50 l, the risk arising from further washings mostly remains at accepted levels. Whenever the prewashing is carried out, the tank washings only represent a minor and local risk for water biota. The study showed that prewashing requirements for the most hazardous category of X cargoes and high-viscosity and solidifying Y cargoes are necessary to keep the hazards arising from these substances at accepted levels. Furthermore, MARPOL Y class also includes persistent and toxic chemicals whose release in the sea without prewashing is not recommended, even if the regulations might not necessarily require prewashing.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 183
页数:23
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]  
CEPA, 2000, PRIOR SUBST LIST ASS
[12]   Ecotoxicity hazard assessment of styrene [J].
Cushman, JR ;
Rausina, GA ;
Cruzan, G ;
Gilbert, J ;
Williams, E ;
Harrass, MC ;
Sousa, JV ;
Putt, AE ;
Garvey, NA ;
StLaurent, JP ;
Hoberg, JR ;
Machado, MW .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 1997, 37 (02) :173-180
[13]  
Drew Marine, 2005, TANK CLEAN MAN
[14]  
FEA, 2012, PROT BALT SEA
[15]   Geo-chemical and optical characterizations of suspended matter in European coastal waters [J].
Ferrari, GM ;
Bo, FG ;
Babin, M .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2003, 57 (1-2) :17-24
[16]  
Fliedner A, 1993, UBAB0024B22 FRAUNH U
[17]   APPROACHES TO MODELING TOXIC RESPONSES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS TO AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS [J].
GALASSI, S ;
MINGAZZINI, M ;
VIGANO, L ;
CESAREO, D ;
TOSATO, ML .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 1988, 16 (02) :158-169
[18]  
GESAMP IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection, 2002, REP STUD GESAMP
[19]  
Hakanson L., 2003, ENV SCI, P120
[20]  
Hanninen S., 2006, VTT PUBLICATIONS, V595