PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR AFTER RESECTION FOR BONE-TUMORS

被引：55

作者：

MORRIS, HG ^{[1
]}

CAPANNA, R ^{[1
]}

DELBEN, M ^{[1
]}

CAMPANACCI, D ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV BOLOGNA,IST ORTOPED RIZZOLI,ORTHOPAED CLIN 1,I-40136 BOLOGNA,ITALY

来源：

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 1995年 / 10卷 / 03期

关键词：

FEMORAL RECONSTRUCTION; TUMOR; ENDOPROSTHESIS; GRADE;

D O I：

10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80177-9

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Thirty-one cases of endoprosthetic proximal femoral reconstruction after resection for bone tumors are reported. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years (average, 63 months). There were two local recurrences, two deaths from pulmonary metastases, two postoperative infections (1 superficial and 1 deep), both responding to therapy, one postoperative dislocation of a bipolar endoprosthesis, and two cases of loosening of acetabular cups on the same patient. Clinical results (Enneking grade) showed 27% E, 56% G, 14% F, and 3% P. Diaphyseal remodeling results (Rizzoli grade) were 29% A, 6% B, 49% C, 10% D, and 6% E. Anchorage (International Society of Limb Salvage grade) was assessed as 97% E and 3% F, whereas interface (International Society of Limb Salvage grade) was 100% E. Hip (bipolar) articulation was graded as 30% E, 56% G, 11% F, and 3% P. Initial rigid stabilization of the stem with cross-fixation screws allows for excellent bone ingrowth, but presents the problem of proximal cortical atrophy. Bipolar hip components are easy to insert and offer greater inherent stability and so are to be recommended for use in tumor surgery. The results suggest good medium- to long-term results with respect to wear. A new radiographic grading system is presented for bipolar arthroplasty. Survivorship of the femoral component in this series is 100% at a maximum follow-up period of 8 years.

引用

页码：293 / 299

页数：7

共 29 条

[1]

Eckardt JJ, Eilber FR, Grant TT, Et al., The UCLA experience in management of stage IIB osteosarcoma, Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology, (1987)

[2]

Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA, A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma, Clin Orthop, 153, (1980)

[3]

Simon MA, Current concepts review: limb salvage in osteosarcoma, J Bone Joint Surg, 70 A, (1988)

[4]

Springfield DS, Schmidt FR, Graham-Pole J, Et al., Surgical treatment for osteosarcoma, J Bone Joint Surg, 70 A, (1988)

[5]

Kotz R, Ritschl P, Trachtenbrodt J, A modular femur and tibia reconstruction system, Orthopaedics, 9, (1986)

[6]

Capanna R, Leonessa C, Bettelli G, Et al., Modular Kotz prosthesis: the Rizzoli experience, New developments for limb salvage in musculoskeletal tumours, (1989)

[7]

Enneking WF, Modification of the system for functional evaluation of surgical management of musculoskeletal tumours, Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology, (1987)

[8]

Bingold AC, Prosthetic replacement of a chondrosarcoma of the upper end of the femur: 18 year followup, J Bone Joint Surg, 54 B, (1972)

[9]

Capanna R, Donati D, Fazioli F, Et al., Iliofemoral arthrodesis with intercalary allograft, Complications of limb salvage, (1991)

[10]

Courpied JP, Tomeno B, Total massive hip prostheses for tumours of the upper femur: analysis of twenty cases, New developments for limb salvage in musculoskeletal tumours, (1989)

← 1 2 3 →