TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT (TQM) AND SUSTAINABLE COMPANY PERFORMANCES: EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP IN MALAYSIAN FIRMS

被引:0
作者
Idris, Fazli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND SOCIETY | 2011年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
TQM; Stakeholder focus; Malaysia; Company performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the relationship between Total Quality management (TQM) elements and sustainable company performances. TQM models prescribe several important factors: starting with effective leadership that executes brilliant strategies, emphasizing best practices in quality improvements while recognizing the stakeholders' needs. This research employs TQM as the research framework while also taking into consideration the resource-based views (RBV) on the arguments concerning internal capabilities.. An instrument is developed to measure the related TQM constructs and is found to be reliable. Using exploratory factor analysis, it is found that the items clearly fall into six factors: leadership, best practices, customer focus, employee focus, community focus and productivity focus. Another factor analysis on measures of company sustainable performance has resulted in a single factor. The study proceeds with the multiple regression analysis to test the relationship between the dependent, sustainable company performances and the independent factors, the dimensions of TQM. The percentage of variance explained by the three factors is 77 percent with leadership values obtaining 55 percent. In terms of the relationship with performances, all are significantly influenced by customer focus which assumes the highest coefficient of 0.46. It is therefore argued that the leadership within the TQM constructs is the most influencing factor; while to impact on company performance, best practices and stakeholder focus must be implemented. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 52
页数:22
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [81] A review and analysis of the state-of-the-art research on productivity measurement
    Singh, H
    Motwani, J
    Kumar, A
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2000, 100 (5-6) : 234 - 241
  • [82] An empirically validated quality management measurement instrument
    Singh, Prakash J.
    Smith, Alan
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2006, 13 (04) : 493 - 522
  • [83] SINK DS, 1983, IND ENG, V15, P36
  • [84] TQM and customer satisfaction in Malaysia's service sector
    Sit, Wen-Yi
    Ooi, Keng-Boon
    Lin, Binshan
    Chong, Alain Yee-Loong
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2009, 109 (07) : 957 - 975
  • [85] SNELL SA, 1996, RES PERSONNEL HUMAN, P61
  • [86] Ethics and performance management
    Stainer, L
    Stainer, A
    Gully, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1999, 17 (7-8) : 776 - 785
  • [87] Tangen S., 2002, P 7 ASIA PAC IND ENG
  • [88] Tari JJ, 2005, TQM MAG, V17, P182, DOI [10.1108/09544780510583245, DOI 10.1108/09544780510583245]
  • [89] Does total quality management reduce employees' role conflict?
    Teh, Pei-Lee
    Yong, Chen-Chen
    Arumugam, Veeri
    Ooi, Keng-Boon
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2009, 109 (8-9) : 1118 - 1136
  • [90] Thiagaragan T., 2001, INT J QUALITY RELIAB, V18, P289, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02656710110383539, 10.1108/02656710110383539]