Rights or ability: Access to plant genetic resources in India

被引:1
作者
Patnaik, Archana [1 ]
Jongerden, Joost [1 ]
Ruivenkamp, Guido [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Sociol & Anthropol Dev, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
ability; access; commons; intellectual property rights; plant genetic resources;
D O I
10.1111/jwip.12102
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The difficulties that stakeholders face in accessing plant genetic resources have been a concern of many scholars since the introduction of intellectual property rights. One of these issues is that of access, which is mostly approached from a rights perspective. Here it is argued that such a rights perspective limits a critical reflection on the possibilities for enhancing accessibility to the Plant Genetic Resources (PGRs) on three grounds and to go beyond this limitation, we introduce an ability perspective. The ability perspective brings into focus how farmers organise their access to PGRs and is researched in four PGRs conservation banks in India; one ex situ and three in situ. An informal system of conservation (in situ) and sharing through informal networks is found to provide better access mechanisms for the small and marginal farmers in India, while access to conserved resources stored at the three in situ banks created biosocial relations and biosocial commons. However, each case studied had certain disadvantages in respect of granting access to the farmers, so additional mechanisms to facilitate better access to the conserved resources are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 175
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]  
Deibel E., 2014, LIFE SCI SOC POLICY, V10, P1
[12]   Open Variety Rights: Rethinking the Commodification of Plants [J].
Deibel, Eric .
JOURNAL OF AGRARIAN CHANGE, 2013, 13 (02) :282-309
[13]  
Dhillon, 2012, INDIAN J PLANT GENET, V25, P52
[14]   Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security:: political, ethical and technical challenges [J].
Esquinas-Alcázar, J .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2005, 6 (12) :946-953
[15]   The impacts of collective action and property rights on plant genetic resources [J].
Eyzaguirre, Pablo B. ;
Dennis, Evan M. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 35 (09) :1489-1498
[16]   Critical policy sociology: historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis [J].
Gale, T .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY, 2001, 16 (05) :379-393
[17]  
Garde T, 2009, MPI STUD INTELL PROP, V9, P55
[18]  
Global Green Grants Fund, 2011, RET TEACH SEEDS ORG
[19]   RADICAL AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTALISM AND WILDERNESS PRESERVATION - A THIRD-WORLD CRITIQUE [J].
GUHA, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 1989, 11 (01) :71-83
[20]   Re-purposing the master's tools: the open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty [J].
Kloppenburg, Jack .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2014, 41 (06) :1225-1246