Discrepancies in listed adverse drug reactions in pharmaceutical product information supplied by the regulatory authorities in Denmark and the USA

被引:22
作者
Eriksson, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Aagaard, Lise [3 ,4 ]
Jensen, Lars Juhl [1 ]
Borisova, Liza [4 ,5 ]
Horluck, Dorte [4 ,5 ]
Brunak, Soren [1 ,2 ]
Hansen, Ebba Holme [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, NNF Ctr Prot Res, Dept Dis Syst Biol, Blegdamsvej 3B, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Ctr Biol Sequence Anal, Dept Syst Biol, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, Inst Publ Hlth Clin Pharmacol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[4] Danish Pharmacovigilance Res Project DANPREP, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Adverse drug reaction; Denmark; drug approval; drug labeling; drug legislation; European Medicines Agency; Food and Drug Administration; Product information; Regulatory affairs; Summary of Product Characteristics; United States;
D O I
10.1002/prp2.38
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Pharmaceutical product information (PI) supplied by the regulatory authorities serves as a source of information on safe and effective use of drugs. The objectives of this study were to qualitatively and quantitatively compare PIs for selected drugs marketed in both Denmark and the USA with respect to consistency and discrepancy of listed adverse drug reaction (ADR) information. We compared individual ADRs listed in PIs from Denmark and the USA with respect to type and frequency. Consistency was defined as match of ADRs and of ADR frequency or match could not be ruled out. Discrepancies were defined as ADRs listed only in one country or listed with different frequencies. We analyzed PIs for 40 separate drugs from ten therapeutic groups and assigned the 4003 identified ADRs to System Organ Classes (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] terminology). Less than half of listed ADRs (n = 1874; 47%) showed consistency. Discrepancies (n = 2129; 53%) were split into ADRs listed only in the USA (n = 1558; 39%), ADRs listed only in Denmark (n = 325; 8%) and ADRs listed with different frequencies (n = 246; 6%). The majority of listed ADRs were of the type " gastrointestinal disorders" and " nervous system disorders". Our results show great differences in PIs for drugs approved in both Denmark and the USA illuminating concerns about the credibility of the publicly available PIs. The results also represent an argument for further harmonization across borders to improve consistency between authority- supplied information.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF DRUG PRODUCT INFORMATION IN 4 NATIONAL COMPENDIA [J].
ALLOZA, JL ;
LASAGNA, L .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1983, 33 (03) :269-277
[2]   EMA must improve the quality of its clinical trial reports [J].
Barbui, Corrado ;
Baschirotto, Cinzia ;
Cipriani, Andrea .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342
[3]   COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF SAUDI-MARKETED PRODUCTS AND US DRUG LABELING [J].
BAWAZIR, SA ;
ALHASSAN, MI ;
ALKHAMIS, KI ;
ABOUAUDA, HS ;
GUBARA, OA .
DICP-THE ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1991, 25 (7-8) :863-866
[4]  
Brown E., 2007, PHARMACOVIGILANCE
[5]   EMA consults public on plan to increase transparency of drug trial data [J].
Cohen, Deborah .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
[6]  
Duke J, 2011, ARCH INTERN MED, V171, P944, DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.182
[7]  
DUNNE M, 1973, LANCET, V2, P781
[8]  
*EUR COMM, 1999, GUID SUMM PROD CHAR
[9]  
European Commission, 2009, GUID SUMM PROD CHAR
[10]  
European Medicines Agency, 2012, HUM MED