Historical Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment Outcomes from a Single Institution

被引:5
作者
Cross, Deanna [1 ]
Ritter, Mark [2 ]
Reding, Douglas [3 ]
机构
[1] Marshfield Clin Res Fdn, Ctr Human Genet, 1000 North Oak Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Human Oncol, Madison, WI USA
[3] Marshfield Clin Fdn Med Res & Educ, Dept Oncol Hematol, Marshfield, WI USA
关键词
PSA testing; Prostate cancer; Treatment; Outcomes;
D O I
10.3121/cmr.2011.1042
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To quantify outcomes of individuals diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer in a single institution. Design: Retrospective electronic chart abstraction. Setting: Marshfield Clinic, the largest private multispecialty group practice in Wisconsin, and one of the largest in the United States, provides health care services annually to approximately 385,000 unique patients through 1.8 million annual patient encounters. Participants: Individuals within the Marshfield Clinic cancer registry who had been diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1960 and 2009. Methods: Electronic chart abstraction from the cancer registry and the electronic medical record was conducted (N=6,181). Data abstracted included age at diagnosis; stage and grade of tumor; prostate specific antigen (PSA) values before, at, and after diagnosis; initial cancer treatment; follow-up time; subsequent cancer treatments; evidence of metastasis; age of death; and cause of death, if known. Results: The average age of prostate cancer diagnosis has decreased from 70-71 years in the 1960's and 1970's to an average age at diagnosis of 67 years in the 2000's (P < 0.001). This decrease in age occurred within the decades of implementation of PSA screening. Approximately 74% of men diagnosed with prostate cancer within the PSA screening era had at least one PSA test, and the presence of a PSA test did not appear to change treatment outcome. Age, grade, and stage were the biggest predictors of prostate cancer outcome. There was no difference in event-free survival between current treatment types (radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, photon treatment, or intensity-modulated radiation therapy) (2003 or later) when stratified by age (greater than 85%, 5-year event-free survival P=0.85); however, more events occurred with older external beam radiation treatment regimens (1993-2003) (70% to 75%, 5-year event-free survival P=0.001). Conclusion: Individuals diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer within the Marshfield Clinic comprehensive care setting follow national trends with a decreased age of diagnosis since the advent of PSA screening. Outcomes for individuals treated within the Clinic system are also comparable to national trends.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 105
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Prostate cancer - Which treatment to choose?
    Adkison, Jarrod B.
    Ritter, Mark A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (12) : 1352 - 1352
  • [2] Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Grubb, Robert L., III
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Chia, David
    Church, Timothy R.
    Fouad, Mona N.
    Gelmann, Edward P.
    Kvale, Paul A.
    Reding, Douglas J.
    Weissfeld, Joel L.
    Yokochi, Lance A.
    Crawford, E. David
    O'Brien, Barbara
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Rathmell, Joshua M.
    Riley, Thomas L.
    Hayes, Richard B.
    Kramer, Barnett S.
    Izmirlian, Grant
    Miller, Anthony B.
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Prorok, Philip C.
    Gohagan, John K.
    Berg, Christine D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) : 1310 - 1319
  • [3] Screening for Prostate Cancer - The Controversy That Refuses to Die
    Barry, Michael J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) : 1351 - 1354
  • [4] Emerging Technologies in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: Improving the Therapeutic Window
    Biagioli, Matthew C.
    Hoffe, Sarah E.
    [J]. CANCER CONTROL, 2010, 17 (04) : 223 - 232
  • [5] Decreasing age at prostate cancer diagnosis over successive generations in prostate cancer families
    Bock, CH
    Peyser, PA
    Montie, JE
    Cooney, KA
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2005, 64 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [6] Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Chou, Roger
    Croswell, Jennifer M.
    Dana, Tracy
    Bougatsos, Christina
    Blazina, Ian
    Fu, Rongwei
    Gleitsmann, Ken
    Koenig, Helen C.
    Lam, Clarence
    Maltz, Ashley
    Rugge, J. Bruin
    Lin, Kenneth
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (11) : 762 - U94
  • [7] Surgery versus implant for early prostate cancer: Results from a single institution, 1992-2005
    Colberg, John W.
    Decker, Roy H.
    Khan, Anwar M.
    McKeon, Ann
    Wilson, Lynn D.
    Peschel, Richard E.
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (04) : 229 - 232
  • [8] Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization, 2009, I MED IN NAT PRIOR C
  • [9] A critical review of clinical practice guidelines for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Dahm, Philipp
    Yeung, Lawrence L.
    Chang, Sam S.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (02) : 451 - 459
  • [10] Edwards BK, 2010, CANCER, V16, P544