RECOVERY AND DISCHARGE OF PATIENTS AFTER LONG PROPOFOL INFUSION VS ISOFLURANE ANESTHESIA FOR AMBULATORY SURGERY

被引:39
作者
VALANNE, J [1 ]
机构
[1] LAPIN UNIHAMMAS INC,ROVANIEMI,FINLAND
关键词
ANESTHESIA; OUTPATIENT; RECOVERY; ANESTHETICS; GENERAL; PROPOFOL; ISOFLURANE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.1992.tb03513.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Fifty unpremedicated patients scheduled for outpatient restorative dentistry and/or oral surgery lasting 2 to 4 h were anaesthetized with either propofol infusion or isoflurane inhalation. Before induction of anaesthesia with propofol (2.5 mg.kg-1), all patients were given 75 mg of diclofenac and 0.01 mg.kg-1 vecuronium intravenously. Intubation was facilitated with suxamethonium 1.5 mg.kg-1) and anaesthesia was maintained in random order either with propofol infusion (12 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first 20 min, 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the next 20 min, and 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the rest of the anaesthesia) or with isoflurane (inspired concentration 1-2.5%), both with nitrous oxide and oxygen (30%). The patients breathed spontaneously using a non-rebreathing circuit. Patients given propofol infusion became re-orientated faster (11.0 +/- 5.5 min vs. 16.5 +/- 7.5 min; P < 0.01) and at 30 min walked along a straight line better (P < 0.01). At 60 min, none of the propofol patients displayed an unsteady gait, whereas 11 of the 25 isoflurane patients did (P < 0.001). None of the patients receiving propofol had emesis at the clinic, compared with 10 of the 25 patients receiving isoflurane (P < 0.001). The overall incidence of emesis was 2 of 25 and 14 of 25 in the propofol and isoflurance groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Patients receiving propofol were discharged home earlier than patients receiving isoflurane (80 +/- 14 min and 102 +/- 32 min, respectively; P < 0.01). It is concluded that propofol allows early discharge of patients, even after long anaesthesias.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 533
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
DOZE VA, 1986, ANESTH ANALG, V65, P1189
[2]   PROPOFOL NITROUS OXIDE VERSUS THIOPENTAL-ISOFLURANE NITROUS OXIDE FOR GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
DOZE, VA ;
SHAFER, A ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (01) :63-71
[3]  
GELFMAN SS, 1979, J ORAL SURG, V37, P391
[4]  
HORRIGAN BW, 1980, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V52, P362
[5]   RECOVERY AFTER GENERAL-ANESTHESIA FOR LAPAROSCOPY [J].
HOVORKA, J ;
LEHTINEN, AM ;
KALLI, I .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1983, 27 (05) :396-399
[6]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF OUTCOME AFTER PROPOFOL NITROUS OXIDE OR ENFLURANE NITROUS OXIDE ANESTHESIA IN OPERATIONS OF LONG DURATION [J].
KORTTILA, K ;
OSTMAN, PL ;
FAURE, E ;
APFELBAUM, JL ;
EKDAWI, M ;
ROIZEN, MF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1989, 36 (06) :651-657
[7]   COMPARISON OF DIAZEPAM AND FLUNITRAZEPAM FOR SEDATION DURING LOCAL-ANESTHESIA FOR BRONCHOSCOPY [J].
KORTTILA, K ;
SAARNIVAARA, L ;
TARKKANEN, J ;
HIMBERG, JJ ;
HYTONEN, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1978, 50 (03) :281-287
[8]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF RECOVERY AFTER PROPOFOL-NITROUS OXIDE VERSUS THIOPENTONE-ISOFLURANE-NITROUS OXIDE ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING AMBULATORY SURGERY [J].
KORTTILA, K ;
OSTMAN, P ;
FAURE, E ;
APFELBAUM, JL ;
PRUNSKIS, J ;
EKDAWI, M ;
ROIZEN, MF .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 34 (05) :400-403
[9]  
KORTTILA K, 1976, ANAESTHESIA, V21, P31
[10]   COMPARISON OF THE NEW EMULSION FORMULATION OF PROPOFOL WITH METHOHEXITONE AND THIOPENTONE FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN DAY CASES [J].
MACKENZIE, N ;
GRANT, IS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 57 (08) :725-731