An annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures

被引:9
作者
Harris, Randy Allen [1 ]
Di Marco, Chrysanne [2 ]
Ruan, Sebastian [2 ]
O'Reilly, Cliff [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept English Language & Literature, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Cheriton Sch Comp Sci, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[3] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Cambridge, England
关键词
Rhetoric; rhetorical figures; annotation; argument mining; XML;
D O I
10.3233/AAC-180037
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
There is a driving need computationally to interrogate large bodies of text for a range of non-denotative meaning (e.g., to plot chains of reasoning, detect sentiment, diagnose genre, and so forth). But such meaning has always proven computationally allusive. It is often implicit, 'hidden' meaning, evoked by linguistic cues, stylistic arrangement, or conceptual structure features that have hitherto been difficult for Natural Language Processing systems to recognize and use. Non-denotative textual effects are the historical concern of rhetorical studies, and we have turned to rhetoric in order to find new ways to advance NLP, especially for sophisticated tasks like Argument Mining. This paper highlights certain rhetorical devices that encode levels of meaning that have been overlooked in Computational Linguistics generally and Argument Mining particularly, and yet lend themselves to automated detection. These devices are the linguistic configurations known as Rhetorical Figures. We argue for the importance of these devices for Argument Mining, especially in collocations, and we present an XML annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures to make figuration more tractable for computational approaches, particularly with an eye on the improvements they offer Argument Mining. We also discuss the intellectual and technical challenges involved in figure annotation and the implications for Machine Learning.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 175
页数:21
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Alexis A., 2015, 15 DOGS
[2]  
Alliheedi M., 2014, P 2014 CAN ART INT C
[3]  
Alliheedi M., 2012, THESIS
[4]  
Burke Kenneth, 1969, GRAMMAR MOTIVES
[5]  
Bush George W., 2001, AM PRESIDENCY PROJEC
[6]  
Cacciari C., 1997, FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE, P44
[7]  
Chatwin B., 2005, IN PATAGONIA
[8]  
Chien L., 2010, COGNITIVE SEMIOTICS, V6, P155, DOI [10.1515/cogsem.2010.6.spring2010.155, DOI 10.3726/81610_155]
[9]  
Clinton H., 2013, STATEMENT AM MARRIAG
[10]  
Crosswhite J., 2000, S ARG COMP 2000 JUN