Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research

被引:28
|
作者
Kim, Won Oak [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Anesthesia & Pain Res Inst, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 134,Sinchon Dong, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
Ethics; Human; Institutional review board; Research;
D O I
10.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Clinical research has expanded tremendously in the past few decades and consequently there has been growing interest in the ethical guidelines that are being followed for the protection of human subjects. This review summarizes historical scandals and social responses chronologically from World War II to the Death of Ellen Roche (2001) to emphasize the lessons we must learn from history. International ethical guidelines for studies with human subjects are also briefly described in order to understand the circumstances of clinical research. The tasks and responsibilities of the institutions and investigators in human subject research to preserve the safety and welfare of research subjects are summarized. Next, several debated ethical issues and insights are arranged as controversial topics. This brief review and summary seeks to highlight important arguments and make suggestions to institutional review boards ( IRBs) to contribute to the future evolution of ethics in clinical research as we advance forward.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Heterogeneous perception of the ethical legitimacy of unbalanced randomization by institutional review board members: a clinical vignette-based survey
    Dibao-Dina, Clarisse
    Caille, Agnes
    Giraudeau, Bruno
    TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [22] Heterogeneous perception of the ethical legitimacy of unbalanced randomization by institutional review board members: a clinical vignette-based survey
    Clarisse Dibao-Dina
    Agnès Caille
    Bruno Giraudeau
    Trials, 19
  • [23] Investigating perceived institutional review board quality and function using the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool
    Reeser, Jonathan C.
    Austin, Diane M.
    Jaros, Linda M.
    Mukesh, Bickol N.
    McCarty, Catherine A.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2008, 3 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [24] Institutional Review Board review and consent for research: What's behind the statistics?
    Danis, M
    Grady, C
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (09) : 1488 - 1489
  • [25] Demystifying the Institutional Review Board
    Hicks, Rodney W.
    Hines, Kelli
    Henson, Bradley
    AORN JOURNAL, 2021, 114 (04) : 309 - 318
  • [26] Approaches to Facilitate Institutional Review Board Approval of Multicenter Research Studies
    Marsolo, Keith
    MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (07) : S77 - S81
  • [27] IRB-draft-generator: A generative AI tool to streamline the creation of institutional review board applications
    Godwin, Ryan C.
    Bryant, Ayesha S.
    Wagener, Brant M.
    Ness, Timothy J.
    DeBerry, Jennifer J.
    Horn, LaShun L.
    Graves, Shanna H.
    Archer, Ashley C.
    Melvin, Ryan L.
    SOFTWAREX, 2024, 25
  • [28] Comment on the Proposed Institutional Review Board Retrospective Review of Research
    Tsan, Min-Fu
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2020, 15 (03) : 229 - 231
  • [29] Ethical issues in research: Human and animal experimentation
    Harper, Luke
    Herbst, Katherine W.
    Kalfa, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2018, 14 (03) : 287 - 288
  • [30] Participation of civilians in Catalonian clinical research and health care institutional ethical review committees
    Moharra, Montse
    Pons, Joan M., V
    Almazan, Cari
    Quintana, Salvador
    ACTA BIOETHICA, 2018, 24 (02): : 189 - 198