Comparison of the hemodynamic response to induction and intubation during a target-controlled infusion of propofol with 2 different pharmacokinetic models. A prospective ramdomized trial

被引:3
|
作者
Ramos Luengo, A. [1 ]
Asensio Merino, F. [1 ]
Castilla, M. S. [2 ]
Alonso Rodriguez, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Severo Ochoa, Serv Anestesia & Reanimac, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Puerta Hierro, Serv Anestesia & Reanimac, Madrid, Spain
来源
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION | 2015年 / 62卷 / 09期
关键词
Intravenous anaesthesia; Propofol; Pharmacokinetics; Drug delivery systems; Consciousness monitors; Haemodynamics/drugs effects;
D O I
10.1016/j.redar.2014.12.003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Determine the best propofol pharmacokinetic model that meets patient requirements and is devoid of major haemodynamic side effects. Material and methods: Prospective, randomised, open-label, clinical trial was performed on an intention to treat basis. It included 280 patients with ASA physical status I-III, aged 18 to 80 years and weight range between 45 to 100 kg, scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomized into 2 groups according to the pharmacokinetic model: Modified Marsh group and Schnider group. The haemodynamic changes that occurred during the induction and intubation were analysed. A propofol target controlled infusion was started to achieve and maintain a bispectral index value between 35 and 55. At minute 6, orotracheal intubation was performed and the study finished at minute 11. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure and their product (HR x MAP) were measured and recorded every minute throughout the study. Every HR x MAP value was compared to its baseline value to determine the minimum value before intubation, the maximum value after intubation, the maximum variation after intubation, and its final value. The GRADIENTE (MIN, MAX) variable (primary endpoint of this study) analyses the difference between maximal and minimal values related to intubation. Propofol doses and calculated concentrations and any hypotensive events were also recorded. Results: No differences were found between groups regarding haemodynamic performance. GRADIENTE (MIN, MAX) values and the percentage of hypotensive events were: Modified Marsh group median 77.41% vs. Schnider group 84.86% (p = 0.821) and 17.3% vs. 12.8% (p = 0.292), respectively. Conclusion: The study failed to demonstrate any haemodynamic difference between the 2 groups, even though the Modified Marsh group received a larger dose of propofol. (C) 2014 Sociedad Espanola de Anestesiologia, Reanimacion y Terapeutica del Dolor. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 494
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparison of the Effects of Prolonged Infusion of Propofol 2% and 1% During Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Using Target-Controlled Infusion Technique for Elective Neurosurgery
    Loo, Kar Yee
    Che Omar, Sanihah
    Mohamad Zaini, Rhendra Hardy
    Wan Hassan, Wan Mohd Nazaruddin
    Seevaunnamtum, Praveena
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (04): : 75 - 87
  • [32] Target-controlled infusion during monitored anesthesia care in patients undergoing EUS: Propofol alone versus midazolam plus propofol A prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Fanti, L.
    Agostoni, M.
    Arcidiacono, P. G.
    Albertin, A.
    Strini, G.
    Carrara, S.
    Guslandi, M.
    Torri, G.
    Testoni, P. A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [33] Brain monitoring in dogs using the cerebral state index during the induction of anaesthesia via target-controlled infusion of propofol
    Ribeiro, Lenio M.
    Ferreira, David A.
    Bressan, Nadja M.
    Nunes, Catarina S.
    Amorim, Pedro
    Antunes, Luis M.
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2008, 85 (02) : 227 - 232
  • [34] Comparison of the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol target-controlled infusion for sedation during coblation-assisted upper airway procedure
    Ma Xiao-xu
    Fang Xiang-ming
    Hou Tie-ning
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 125 (05) : 869 - 873
  • [35] Relationship between depth of anesthesia and effect-site concentration of propofol during induction with the target-controlled infusion technique in elderly patients
    Liu Shao-hua
    Wei Wei
    Ding Guan-nan
    Ke Jing-dong
    Hong Fang-xiao
    Tian Ming
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 122 (08) : 935 - 940
  • [36] Evaluating Midazolam's Influence on Bispectral Index and Propofol Concentrations Using Schnider and Eleveld Models in Target-Controlled Infusion General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study
    Linassi, Federico
    Zanatta, Paolo
    Kreuzer, Matthias
    Ciavattini, Emma
    Rizzetto, Christian
    Carron, Michele
    LIFE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [37] Comparison of hemodynamics during induction of general anesthesia with remimazolam and target-controlled propofol in middle-aged and elderly patients: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial
    Sekiguchi, Ryo
    Kinoshita, Michiko
    Kawanishi, Ryosuke
    Kakuta, Nami
    Sakai, Yoko
    Tanaka, Katsuya
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [38] Comparison of hemodynamics during induction of general anesthesia with remimazolam and target-controlled propofol in middle-aged and elderly patients: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial
    Ryo Sekiguchi
    Michiko Kinoshita
    Ryosuke Kawanishi
    Nami Kakuta
    Yoko Sakai
    Katsuya Tanaka
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [39] Age influences on Propofol estimated brain concentration and entropy during maintenance and at return of consciousness during total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion in unparalyzed patients: An observational prospective trial
    Linassi, Federico
    Kreuzer, Matthias
    Maran, Eleonora
    Farnia, Antonio
    Zanatta, Paolo
    Navalesi, Paolo
    Carron, Michele
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [40] Prospective randomised comparison of Marsh and Schnider pharmacokinetic models for propofol during induction of anaesthesia in elective cardiac surgery
    Viterbo, Joao F.
    Lourenco, Andre P.
    Leite-Moreira, Adelino F.
    Pinho, Paulo
    Barros, Fernanda
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 29 (10) : 477 - 483