Comparison of the hemodynamic response to induction and intubation during a target-controlled infusion of propofol with 2 different pharmacokinetic models. A prospective ramdomized trial

被引:3
|
作者
Ramos Luengo, A. [1 ]
Asensio Merino, F. [1 ]
Castilla, M. S. [2 ]
Alonso Rodriguez, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Severo Ochoa, Serv Anestesia & Reanimac, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Puerta Hierro, Serv Anestesia & Reanimac, Madrid, Spain
来源
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION | 2015年 / 62卷 / 09期
关键词
Intravenous anaesthesia; Propofol; Pharmacokinetics; Drug delivery systems; Consciousness monitors; Haemodynamics/drugs effects;
D O I
10.1016/j.redar.2014.12.003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Determine the best propofol pharmacokinetic model that meets patient requirements and is devoid of major haemodynamic side effects. Material and methods: Prospective, randomised, open-label, clinical trial was performed on an intention to treat basis. It included 280 patients with ASA physical status I-III, aged 18 to 80 years and weight range between 45 to 100 kg, scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomized into 2 groups according to the pharmacokinetic model: Modified Marsh group and Schnider group. The haemodynamic changes that occurred during the induction and intubation were analysed. A propofol target controlled infusion was started to achieve and maintain a bispectral index value between 35 and 55. At minute 6, orotracheal intubation was performed and the study finished at minute 11. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure and their product (HR x MAP) were measured and recorded every minute throughout the study. Every HR x MAP value was compared to its baseline value to determine the minimum value before intubation, the maximum value after intubation, the maximum variation after intubation, and its final value. The GRADIENTE (MIN, MAX) variable (primary endpoint of this study) analyses the difference between maximal and minimal values related to intubation. Propofol doses and calculated concentrations and any hypotensive events were also recorded. Results: No differences were found between groups regarding haemodynamic performance. GRADIENTE (MIN, MAX) values and the percentage of hypotensive events were: Modified Marsh group median 77.41% vs. Schnider group 84.86% (p = 0.821) and 17.3% vs. 12.8% (p = 0.292), respectively. Conclusion: The study failed to demonstrate any haemodynamic difference between the 2 groups, even though the Modified Marsh group received a larger dose of propofol. (C) 2014 Sociedad Espanola de Anestesiologia, Reanimacion y Terapeutica del Dolor. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 494
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of the effects of two different doses of ketamine used for co-induction of anaesthesia with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in dogs
    Mair, Alastair R.
    Pawson, Patricia
    Courcier, Emily
    Flaherty, Derek
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 36 (06) : 532 - 538
  • [22] Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Nasotracheal versus Orotracheal Intubation during Target-controlled Infusion of Propofol
    Kwak, H. J.
    Min, S. K.
    Kim, D. H.
    Kang, M.
    Kim, J. Y.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 39 (05) : 1816 - 1823
  • [23] Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial
    Simoni, Ricardo Francisco
    de Paula Gomes Miziara, Luiz Eduardo
    Esteves, Luis Otavio
    Silva, Diogenes de Oliveira
    Ribeiro, Cristina Alves
    Smith, Mariana Oki
    de Paula, Leonardo Ferreira
    Cangiani, Luis Henrique
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2015, 65 (02): : 99 - 103
  • [24] Effect-compartment equilibrium rate constant (keo) for propofol during induction of anesthesia with a target-controlled infusion device
    Lim T.A.
    Wong W.H.
    Lim K.Y.
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2006, 20 (2) : 153 - 155
  • [25] Comparison of arterial hypotension incidence during general anesthesia induction - target-controlled infusion vs. bolus injection of propofol: a randomized clinical trial
    Vale, Ana G. G.
    Goveia, Catia S.
    Guimaraes, Gabriel M. N.
    Terra, Laize R.
    Ladeira, Luis C. A.
    Essado, Guilherme A.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 74 (04):
  • [26] Comparison of predicted and real propofol and remifentanil concentrations in plasma and brain tissue during target-controlled infusion: a prospective observational study
    Van Hese, L.
    Theys, T.
    Absalom, A. R.
    Rex, S.
    Cuypers, E.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 75 (12) : 1626 - 1634
  • [27] Comparison of target concentration of propofol during three phases of live donor liver transplant surgery using a target-controlled infusion of propofol total intravenous anaesthesia - A prospective, observational pilot study
    Garg, Neha
    Kalra, Yatin
    Panwar, Shivali
    Arora, Mahesh K.
    Dhingra, Udit
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (11) : 971 - 977
  • [28] Application of Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion for Optimized Hemodynamic Status in ESRD Patients Receiving Arteriovenous Access Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chen, Po-Nien
    Lu, I-Cheng
    Huang, Tsz-Wen
    Chen, Po-Chun
    Lin, Wen-Chiao
    Lu, Wen-Lin
    Tse, Jockey
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (09):
  • [29] Anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of propofol during elective pediatric surgery: Kataria versus Paedfusor pharmacokinetic model
    Hassan, Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan
    Mansor, Azelia
    Zaini, Rhendra Hardy Mohamad
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2018, 22 (02) : 207 - 211
  • [30] Effect of target-controlled infusion of remifentanil in combination with propofol on anesthesia and endotracheal intubation response in patients undergoing surgical aneurysm clipping
    Yang, Shijie
    Wu, Yaqin
    Chen, Jingli
    Li, Shenghua
    TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 23 (02) : 457 - 463