Comparison of the hemodynamic response to induction and intubation during a target-controlled infusion of propofol with 2 different pharmacokinetic models. A prospective ramdomized trial

被引:3
|
作者
Ramos Luengo, A. [1 ]
Asensio Merino, F. [1 ]
Castilla, M. S. [2 ]
Alonso Rodriguez, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Severo Ochoa, Serv Anestesia & Reanimac, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Puerta Hierro, Serv Anestesia & Reanimac, Madrid, Spain
来源
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION | 2015年 / 62卷 / 09期
关键词
Intravenous anaesthesia; Propofol; Pharmacokinetics; Drug delivery systems; Consciousness monitors; Haemodynamics/drugs effects;
D O I
10.1016/j.redar.2014.12.003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Determine the best propofol pharmacokinetic model that meets patient requirements and is devoid of major haemodynamic side effects. Material and methods: Prospective, randomised, open-label, clinical trial was performed on an intention to treat basis. It included 280 patients with ASA physical status I-III, aged 18 to 80 years and weight range between 45 to 100 kg, scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomized into 2 groups according to the pharmacokinetic model: Modified Marsh group and Schnider group. The haemodynamic changes that occurred during the induction and intubation were analysed. A propofol target controlled infusion was started to achieve and maintain a bispectral index value between 35 and 55. At minute 6, orotracheal intubation was performed and the study finished at minute 11. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure and their product (HR x MAP) were measured and recorded every minute throughout the study. Every HR x MAP value was compared to its baseline value to determine the minimum value before intubation, the maximum value after intubation, the maximum variation after intubation, and its final value. The GRADIENTE (MIN, MAX) variable (primary endpoint of this study) analyses the difference between maximal and minimal values related to intubation. Propofol doses and calculated concentrations and any hypotensive events were also recorded. Results: No differences were found between groups regarding haemodynamic performance. GRADIENTE (MIN, MAX) values and the percentage of hypotensive events were: Modified Marsh group median 77.41% vs. Schnider group 84.86% (p = 0.821) and 17.3% vs. 12.8% (p = 0.292), respectively. Conclusion: The study failed to demonstrate any haemodynamic difference between the 2 groups, even though the Modified Marsh group received a larger dose of propofol. (C) 2014 Sociedad Espanola de Anestesiologia, Reanimacion y Terapeutica del Dolor. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 494
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Models in Chinese Patients with Hepatic Insufficiency
    Chi, Xinjin
    Pan, Jingru
    Cai, Jun
    Luo, Gangjian
    Li, Shangrong
    Yuan, Dongdong
    Rui, Jianzhong
    Chen, Wenying
    Hei, Ziqing
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 6925 - 6933
  • [2] A comparison of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion for oocyte retrieval
    Coskun, Demet
    Gunaydin, Berrin
    Tas, Ayca
    Inan, Gozde
    Celebi, Hulya
    Kaya, Kadir
    CLINICS, 2011, 66 (05) : 811 - 815
  • [3] Comparison of the Effects of Dexmedetomidine on the Induction of Anaesthesia Using Marsh and Schnider Pharmacokinetic Models of Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion
    Hassan, Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan
    Siang, Tan Hai
    Zaini, Rhendra Hardy Mohamed
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 25 (01): : 24 - 31
  • [4] Comparison of Effects of Thoracic Epidural and Intravenous Administration of Lidocaine on Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol and Tracheal Intubation Response During Induction of Anesthesia
    Yang, Wanchao
    Geng, Yingjie
    Liu, Yan
    Li, Aimin
    Liu, Jing
    Xing, Jingchun
    Li, Wenzhi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (06) : 1295 - 1300
  • [5] Schnider and Eleveld Models for Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Anesthesia: A Clinical Comparison
    Linassi, Federico
    Zanatta, Paolo
    Spano, Leonardo
    Burelli, Paolo
    Farnia, Antonio
    Carron, Michele
    LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [6] Accuracy of target-controlled infusion (TCI) with 2 different propofol formulations
    Ihmsen, H
    Jeleazcov, C
    Schüttler, J
    Schwilden, H
    Bremer, F
    ANAESTHESIST, 2004, 53 (10): : 937 - 943
  • [7] A comparison of two techniques for induction of anaesthesia with target-controlled infusion of propofol
    Mu, J. J.
    Jiang, T.
    Deng, L. P.
    Choi, S. W.
    Irwin, M. G.
    Yuen, V. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 (12) : 1507 - 1514
  • [8] Performance of target-controlled infusion of propofol using two different pharmacokinetic models in open heart surgery - a randomised controlled study
    Mathew, P. J.
    Sailam, S.
    Sivasailam, R.
    Thingnum, S. K. S.
    Puri, G. D.
    PERFUSION-UK, 2016, 31 (01): : 45 - 53
  • [9] Propofol Target-controlled Infusion in Anesthesia Induction during Painless Gastroscopy
    Li, Dong-Ni
    Zhao, Guo-Qing
    Su, Zhen-Bo
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2019, 29 (07): : 604 - 607
  • [10] Comparison between the different pharmacokinetic models of Propofol target controlled infusion : a narrative review
    Abdul-Latif, K. W.
    Van de Velde, M.
    Al Tmimi, L.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA, 2020, 71 : 129 - 133