Comparison of the hemodynamic response to induction and intubation during a target-controlled infusion of propofol with 2 different pharmacokinetic models. A prospective ramdomized trial

被引:3
作者
Ramos Luengo, A. [1 ]
Asensio Merino, F. [1 ]
Castilla, M. S. [2 ]
Alonso Rodriguez, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Severo Ochoa, Serv Anestesia & Reanimac, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Puerta Hierro, Serv Anestesia & Reanimac, Madrid, Spain
来源
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION | 2015年 / 62卷 / 09期
关键词
Intravenous anaesthesia; Propofol; Pharmacokinetics; Drug delivery systems; Consciousness monitors; Haemodynamics/drugs effects;
D O I
10.1016/j.redar.2014.12.003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Determine the best propofol pharmacokinetic model that meets patient requirements and is devoid of major haemodynamic side effects. Material and methods: Prospective, randomised, open-label, clinical trial was performed on an intention to treat basis. It included 280 patients with ASA physical status I-III, aged 18 to 80 years and weight range between 45 to 100 kg, scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomized into 2 groups according to the pharmacokinetic model: Modified Marsh group and Schnider group. The haemodynamic changes that occurred during the induction and intubation were analysed. A propofol target controlled infusion was started to achieve and maintain a bispectral index value between 35 and 55. At minute 6, orotracheal intubation was performed and the study finished at minute 11. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure and their product (HR x MAP) were measured and recorded every minute throughout the study. Every HR x MAP value was compared to its baseline value to determine the minimum value before intubation, the maximum value after intubation, the maximum variation after intubation, and its final value. The GRADIENTE (MIN, MAX) variable (primary endpoint of this study) analyses the difference between maximal and minimal values related to intubation. Propofol doses and calculated concentrations and any hypotensive events were also recorded. Results: No differences were found between groups regarding haemodynamic performance. GRADIENTE (MIN, MAX) values and the percentage of hypotensive events were: Modified Marsh group median 77.41% vs. Schnider group 84.86% (p = 0.821) and 17.3% vs. 12.8% (p = 0.292), respectively. Conclusion: The study failed to demonstrate any haemodynamic difference between the 2 groups, even though the Modified Marsh group received a larger dose of propofol. (C) 2014 Sociedad Espanola de Anestesiologia, Reanimacion y Terapeutica del Dolor. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 494
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Pharmacokinetic models for propofol-defining and illuminating the devil in the detail [J].
Absalom, A. R. ;
Mani, V. ;
De Smet, T. ;
Struys, M. M. R. F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 103 (01) :26-37
[2]   Closed Loop Anesthesia: Are We Getting Close to Finding the Holy Grail? [J].
Absalom, Anthony R. ;
De Keyser, Robin ;
Struys, Michel M. R. F. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (03) :516-518
[3]   HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE TO INDUCTION AND INTUBATION [J].
BILLARD, V ;
MOULLA, F ;
BOURGAIN, JL ;
MEGNIGBETO, A ;
STANSKI, DR .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (06) :1384-1393
[4]   A comparison between target-controlled and manually controlled propofol infusions in patients undergoing routine surgical procedures [J].
Chen, Gang ;
Buell, Oke ;
Gruenewald, Matthias ;
Fudickar, Axel ;
Scholz, Jens ;
Bein, Berthold .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 26 (11) :928-935
[5]  
du Gres B, 1987, Ann Fr Anesth Reanim, V6, P233, DOI 10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80027-8
[6]  
Hacker SO, 2005, CONTEMP TOP LAB ANIM, V44, P7
[7]  
HALL RI, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P680
[8]   A COMPARISON OF THE MYOCARDIAL METABOLIC AND HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES PRODUCED BY PROPOFOL-SUFENTANIL AND ENFLURANE-SUFENTANIL ANESTHESIA FOR PATIENTS HAVING CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT-SURGERY [J].
HALL, RI ;
MURPHY, JT ;
MOFFITT, EA ;
LANDYMORE, R ;
POLLAK, PT ;
POOLE, L .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1991, 38 (08) :996-1004
[9]  
Harris C E, 1988, Anaesthesia, V43 Suppl, P32, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09065.x
[10]  
HUG CC, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, pS21