Comparative Study of Intra-Cervical Foley Catheter and Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening

被引:0
|
作者
Fareed, Perveena [1 ]
Malik, Saba [1 ]
Mahajan, Neha [1 ]
Nazir, Tanzeela [1 ]
Kawoosa, Sanjeeda [1 ]
机构
[1] LD Hosp, Govt Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Srinagar 190001, Jammu & Kashmir, India
关键词
Cervical ripening; Foley catheter; Misoprostol;
D O I
10.17354/ijss/2015/302
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Physical and chemical changes in the uterine cervix and the lower uterine segment, which normally precede the onset of labor are referred to as ripening and seem to be essential to normal labor and delivery. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effi cacy of intracervical Foley catheter and 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol in pre-induction cervical ripening. Study Design: A randomized, prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Srinagar from March 2012 to August 2013. 200 patients at term with a Bishop's score = 3 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to receive intracervical Foley catheter (100 pts) or 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol (100 pts). After 6 h post-induction bishop's score was noted and labor was augmented if required. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and t-test. Result: The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestational age, indication of induction, and initial bishop's score. Both groups showed signifi cant change in the Bishop's score, 3.8 +/- 1.1 and 3.6 +/- 1.1 for Foley catheter and misoprostol, respectively, P < 0.001; however there was no signifi cant difference between the two groups. 14 cesarean sections (14%) were performed in Group A and 19 (19%) were performed in Group B (not signifi cant). The induction to the delivery interval was 18.1 +/- 3.6 h in Group A and 17.7 +/- 4.1 h in Group B (P = 0.408). Apgar score, birth weights, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and maternal side effects showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: This study shows that both Foley catheter and vaginal misoprostol are equally effective in pre-induction cervical ripening.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 43
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction
    El-Khayat, Waleed
    Alelaiw, Heba
    El-kateb, Abdallah
    Elsemary, Ali
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (03) : 487 - 492
  • [32] The effect of a Foley catheter balloon on cervical ripening
    Lim, S. Y.
    Kim, Y. H.
    Kim, C. H.
    Cho, M. K.
    Kim, J. W.
    Kang, W. D.
    Kim, S. M.
    Cho, H. Y.
    Ahn, K. Y.
    Lee, K. H.
    Song, T. B.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 33 (08) : 830 - 838
  • [33] Intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol compared to intravaginal misoprostol-only for cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yin, Juntao
    Li, Yang
    Chen, Yangyang
    Wang, Chaoyang
    Song, Xiaoyong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 281 : 76 - 84
  • [34] Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: The role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix
    Cromi, Antonella
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Tomera, Silvia
    Scandroglio, Sara
    Colombo, Giacomo
    Bolis, Pierfrancesco
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 196 (01) : 41 - 42
  • [35] A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
    Wing, DA
    OrtizOmphroy, G
    Paul, RH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (03) : 612 - 618
  • [36] Vaginal misoprostol and cervical ripening balloon for induction of labor in late-term pregnancies
    Duro Gomez, Jorge
    Garrido Oyarzun, Maria Fernanda
    Rodriguez Marin, Ana Belen
    de la Torre Gonzalez, Antonio Jesus
    Arjona Berral, Jose Eduardo
    Castelo-Branco, Camil
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (01) : 87 - 91
  • [37] Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
    Agarwal, N
    Gupta, A
    Kriplani, A
    Bhatla, N
    Parul
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2003, 29 (03) : 147 - 151
  • [38] Foley catheter versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations
    Mohamed Kandil
    Mohamed Emarh
    Tarek Sayyed
    Alaa Masood
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 286 : 303 - 307
  • [39] Foley catheter versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations
    Kandil, Mohamed
    Emarh, Mohamed
    Sayyed, Tarek
    Masood, Alaa
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (02) : 303 - 307
  • [40] Pre-induction cervical ripening with different initial doses of intravaginal misoprostol: time to delivery and peri-natal outcomes
    Porras Lucena, M.
    Duro Gomez, J.
    De la Torre Gonzalez, A. J.
    Castelo-Branco, C.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (05) : 1112 - 1116