INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE STORAGE OF PERCEPTUAL SEMANTICS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

被引:0
|
作者
Miklashevsky, Alex A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tomsk State Univ, Tomsk, Russia
来源
TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL | 2018年 / 436期
关键词
databases; perceptual semantics; embodied cognition; individual differences; statistical methods;
D O I
10.17223/15617793/436/4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Individual differences of cognitive processes are in the focus of today's research. Gender, age, cultural and professional experiences are considered as important factors influencing human cognition at all levels (perception, categorization, high-level cognitive processing of symbols, such as numbers or words). Embodied cognition theory considers perception and language as tightly linked systems, thus leading to the concept of perceptual semantics, i.e., the whole volume of perceptual information associated with and allowing humans to understand a particular linguistic unit. In the present study, individual differences in the storage of perceptual semantics are investigated. Perceptual semantics is understood as visual, tactile, auditory, olfactory and gustatory experiences associated with the word. A database collected in an earlier study (Miklashevsky, 2018) is used as a source of psycholinguistic data. The study is exploratory, so a preliminary hypothesis was formulated: the storage of perceptual semantics in the individual mind (i.e., when the data are averaged by a participant) should follow the same principles as at the general linguistic level (i.e., when the data are averaged by item) revealed in the earlier study (Miklashevsky, 2018). Statistical methods were used, particularly descriptive statistics, correlational analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, cluster analysis (k-means). As a result of the study, a pattern similar to a general pattern at linguistic level was revealed. Namely, individuals have the following sequence of perceptual information associated with linguistic units (volume of information, descending): visual information > tactile information > auditory information > (olfactory information = gustatory information). Similar correlation between these types of information are observed at both individual (averaged by participant) and general linguistic (averaged by word) levels. The main difference is related to auditory modality: it is associated with other modalities at the individual level (the correlations are positive), when at linguistic level no such associations or even negative associations were found (absent or negative correlations). No influence of gender on perceptive semantics was revealed. It was found that participants studying humanities give higher ratings of visual and gustatory modality than those who study technical disciplines. Two clusters were revealed: group 1 (66% of the sample), which rated visual modality lower than expected, when auditory, olfactory and gustatory modalities higher than expected; group 2 (34% of the sample) with a reversed pattern: higher ratings of visual, lower ratings of auditory, olfactory and gustatory modalities. No differences in the haptic modality are found. The results of this exploratory study might motivate future research investigating revealed regularities by using behavioral (such as reaction time measurement) and neuroimaging methods.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 37
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implicit learning and individual differences in speech recognition: an exploratory study
    Khayr, Ranin
    Karawani, Hanin
    Banai, Karen
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [2] Voluntary- and Involuntary-Distraction Engagement: An Exploratory Study of Individual Differences
    Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie
    Hoekstra-Atwood, Liberty
    Donmez, Birsen
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2018, 60 (04) : 575 - 588
  • [3] Individual differences in perceptual adaptation to unfamiliar phonetic categories
    Kim, Donghyun
    Clayards, Meghan
    Kong, Eun Jong
    JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2020, 81
  • [4] Individual differences in feedback processing affect perceptual learning
    Muller-Gass, Alexandra
    Duncan, Matthew
    Tavakoli, Paniz
    Campbell, Kenneth
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2019, 143 : 145 - 154
  • [5] Brain states predict individual differences in perceptual learning
    Muller-Gass, Alexandra
    Duncan, Matthew
    Campbell, Kenneth
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 118 : 29 - 38
  • [6] Individual differences in metacontrast masking are enhanced by perceptual learning
    Albrecht, Thorsten
    Klapoetke, Susan
    Mattler, Uwe
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2010, 19 (02) : 656 - 666
  • [7] Individual differences in attention influence perceptual decision making
    Nunez, Michael D.
    Srinivasan, Ramesh
    Vandekerckhove, Joachim
    Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, 6
  • [8] Individual differences in the production of nasal coarticulation and perceptual compensation
    Zellou, Georgia
    JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2017, 61 : 13 - 29
  • [9] Individual Differences in Perceptual Sensitivity and Representation of Facial Signals of Trustworthiness
    Baccolo, Elisa
    Cassia, Viola Macchi
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2019, 45 (02) : 224 - 236
  • [10] The influence of perceptual similarity and individual differences on false memories in aging
    Dennis, Nancy A.
    Turney, Indira C.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2018, 62 : 221 - 230