Interpretation Methods in the us Supreme Court: Study of Obamacare, Abortion Cases and Alien Torts Statute Cases

被引：0

作者：

Demeyere, Siel ^{[1
]}

Beke, Joris ^{[2
]}

Dietvorst, Renate ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

[2] Brussels Bar, Quinz, Vilvoorde, Belgium

[3] Maastricht Univ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands

来源：

TILBURG LAW REVIEW-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW | 2015年 / 20卷 / 02期

关键词：

US Supreme Court; Interpretation methods; Obamacare; Abortion cases; Alien Torts Statute;

D O I：

10.1163/22112596-02002005

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

In this article, the interpretation methods used by the United States Supreme Court are studied. We will discuss the interpretation methods used by the Court in the Obamacare case, in abortion cases and in Alien Torts Statute cases. This analysis concludes by asserting the Court is very eclectic in the interpretation methods it uses, although consequential reasoning is most often relied upon.

引用

页码：142 / 160

页数：19

共 4 条

[1] How Relevant to the United Kingdom are the 'Religious' Cases of the US Supreme Court?
Cranmer, Frank
ECCLESIASTICAL LAW JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (03) : 300 - 315
[2] The outcome-prediction strategy in cases denied certiorari by the US Supreme Court
Brenner, Saul
Whitmeyer, Joseph M.
Spaeth, Harold J.
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2007, 130 (1-2) : 225 - 237
[3] Human Rights of Guantanomo Detainees under International and US Law: Revisiting the US Supreme Court Cases
Goedde, Patricia
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2014, 7 (01) : 7 - 29
[4] At the Very Apex: What the Supreme Court's Student Speech Cases Have to Teach Us About a Constitutional Right to Education
Warnick, Bryan R.
Thomas, Christopher D.
TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 2023, 125 (01): : 84 - 103

← 1 →