DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF IOMEPROL AND IOPAMIDOL IN CAROTID DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY

被引:4
|
作者
BELTRAMELLO, A
PIOVAN, E
ROSTA, L
机构
[1] Institute of Radiology, Verona University Hospital, Policlinico Borgo Roma, 37100 Verona, Via delle Menegone
[2] Department of Neuroradiology, Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona
关键词
CONTRAST MEDIA; EFFICACY STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ANGIOGRAPHY; DSA;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(94)90096-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Iomeprol is a nonionic monomer which provides injectable formulations with the lowest osmolalities and the lowest viscosities among the currently available low-osmolar radiographic contrast agents of the same category. These favourable physico-chemical characteristics, together with high water solubility and low molecular toxicity, make this agent particularly suitable for carotid angiography, a procedure in which contrast-induced blood-brain barrier damage is maximal. This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study aimed at comparing the safety, tolerance and efficacy of 200 mgI/ml solutions of iomeprol and iopamidol in 100 consenting adult inpatients undergoing carotid intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA). Both agents appeared to be safe and well tolerated. Only minor and transient adverse events occurred throughout the study. Electroencephalographic and neurological examinations performed pre- and post-contrast showed no abnormality induced by the test compounds. Vessel opacification was good or excellent in the vast majority of technically adequate examinations. Information provided by the angiographic examination was useful for subsequent patient management in almost all cases. It is concluded that iomeprol-200 and iopamidol-200 are safe and effective contrast media when used for carotid IA-DSA, an examination which proves useful not only for the diagnosis of vascular lesions, but also to best direct the management of patients scheduled for surgery of intracranial tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:S67 / S72
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF IODIXANOL-320 AND IOHEXOL-300 FOR CEREBRAL-ANGIOGRAPHY
    POIRIER, VC
    MONSEIN, LH
    NEWBERRY, PD
    KREPS, BJ
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1994, 29 : S43 - S44
  • [32] DIAGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF FLOW SEPARATION WITHIN THE CAROTID BIFURCATION DEMONSTRATED BY DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY
    SCHUIERER, G
    HUK, WJ
    STROKE, 1990, 21 (12) : 1674 - 1679
  • [33] Cerebrovascular disease assessed by color-flow and power Doppler ultrasonography - Comparison with digital subtraction angiography in internal carotid artery stenosis
    Griewing, B
    Morgenstern, C
    Driesner, F
    Kallwellis, G
    Walker, ML
    Kessler, C
    STROKE, 1996, 27 (01) : 95 - 100
  • [34] Lower extremity angiography, improved image quality and outflow vessel detection with bilaterally antegrade selective digital subtraction angiography - A blinded prospective intraindividual comparison with aortic flush digital subtraction angiography
    Jacob, AL
    Stock, KW
    Proske, M
    Steinbrich, W
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1996, 31 (04) : 184 - 193
  • [35] Comparative assessment of image quality for coronary CT angiography with iobitridol and two contrast agents with higher iodine concentrations: iopromide and iomeprol. A multicentre randomized double-blind trial
    Achenbach, Stephan
    Paul, Jean-Francois
    Laurent, Francois
    Becker, Hans-Christoph
    Rengo, Marco
    Caudron, Jerome
    Leschka, Sebastian
    Vignaux, Olivier
    Knobloch, Gesine
    Benea, Giorgio
    Schlosser, Thomas
    Andreu, Jordi
    Cabeza, Beatriz
    Jacquier, Alexis
    Souto, Miguel
    Revel, Didier
    Qanadli, Salah Dine
    Cademartiri, Filippo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) : 821 - 830
  • [36] Validation of Multiparametric Ultrasonography Criteria with Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Study
    Barlinn, Kristian
    Rickmann, Henning
    Kitzler, Hagen
    Krogias, Christos
    Strohm, Henning
    Abramyuk, Andrij
    Barlinn, Jessica
    Siepmann, Timo
    Rabahi, Ali
    Graehlert, Xina
    Schwanebeck, Uta
    Winzer, Simon
    Arnold, Sebastian
    Moennings, Peter
    Pallesen, Lars-Peder
    Bodechtel, Ulf
    Mudra, Harald
    Linn, Jennifer
    Reichmann, Heinz
    Alexandrov, Andrei, V
    Gahn, Georg
    Weiss, Norbert
    Puetz, Volker
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2018, 39 (05): : 535 - 543
  • [37] Comparison of two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity with x-ray angiography
    Winchester, PA
    Lee, HM
    Khilnani, NM
    Wang, Y
    Trost, DW
    Bush, HL
    Sos, TA
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (06) : 891 - 899
  • [38] Bilateral comparison of the vascular pattern of the superficial temporal artery based on digital subtraction angiography
    Theodora Manoli
    Raluca Medesan
    Manuel Held
    Hans-Eberhard Schaller
    Ulrike Ernemann
    Andreas Korn
    Fabian Medved
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2016, 38 : 179 - 186
  • [39] Bilateral comparison of the vascular pattern of the superficial temporal artery based on digital subtraction angiography
    Manoli, Theodora
    Medesan, Raluca
    Held, Manuel
    Schaller, Hans-Eberhard
    Ernemann, Ulrike
    Korn, Andreas
    Medved, Fabian
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2016, 38 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [40] Angiography for acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: Efficacy of cut film compared with digital subtraction techniques
    Defreyne, L
    Uder, M
    Vanlangenhove, P
    Van Maele, G
    Kunnen, M
    Kramann, B
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (03) : 313 - 322