DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF IOMEPROL AND IOPAMIDOL IN CAROTID DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY

被引:4
|
作者
BELTRAMELLO, A
PIOVAN, E
ROSTA, L
机构
[1] Institute of Radiology, Verona University Hospital, Policlinico Borgo Roma, 37100 Verona, Via delle Menegone
[2] Department of Neuroradiology, Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona
关键词
CONTRAST MEDIA; EFFICACY STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ANGIOGRAPHY; DSA;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(94)90096-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Iomeprol is a nonionic monomer which provides injectable formulations with the lowest osmolalities and the lowest viscosities among the currently available low-osmolar radiographic contrast agents of the same category. These favourable physico-chemical characteristics, together with high water solubility and low molecular toxicity, make this agent particularly suitable for carotid angiography, a procedure in which contrast-induced blood-brain barrier damage is maximal. This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study aimed at comparing the safety, tolerance and efficacy of 200 mgI/ml solutions of iomeprol and iopamidol in 100 consenting adult inpatients undergoing carotid intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA). Both agents appeared to be safe and well tolerated. Only minor and transient adverse events occurred throughout the study. Electroencephalographic and neurological examinations performed pre- and post-contrast showed no abnormality induced by the test compounds. Vessel opacification was good or excellent in the vast majority of technically adequate examinations. Information provided by the angiographic examination was useful for subsequent patient management in almost all cases. It is concluded that iomeprol-200 and iopamidol-200 are safe and effective contrast media when used for carotid IA-DSA, an examination which proves useful not only for the diagnosis of vascular lesions, but also to best direct the management of patients scheduled for surgery of intracranial tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:S67 / S72
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Iotrolan 320 and Iohexol 350 in cardiac angiography: a randomised double-blind clinical study
    Mezilis, N
    Salame, MY
    Dyet, JF
    Arafa, SO
    Oakley, GDG
    Cumberland, DC
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 28 (02) : 171 - 175
  • [22] Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography - A double-blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol
    Barrett, Brendan J.
    Katzberg, Richard W.
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    Chen, Nan
    Sahani, Dushyant
    Soulez, Gilles
    Heiken, Jay P.
    Lepanto, Luigi
    Ni, Zhou-Hui
    Nelson, Rendon
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (11) : 815 - 821
  • [23] Correlation of Computed Tomography Angiography to Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Stenosis with Real-World Assessment of Overestimation of Carotid Stenosis on Computed Tomography Angiography
    Roy, Joanna M.
    Abbas, Rawad
    Chong, Weelic
    Muharemmi, Eti
    Hai, Yang
    Morse, Charles
    El Naamani, Kareem
    Atallah, Elias
    Herial, Nabeel A.
    Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula
    Gooch, Michael R.
    Rosenwasser, Robert H.
    Flanders, Adam
    Jabbour, Pascal
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 189 : e452 - e458
  • [24] Kinetic Imaging in Lower Extremity Arteriography: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography
    Gyano, Marcell
    Gog, Istvan
    Orias, Viktor I.
    Ruzsa, Zoltan
    Nemes, Balazs
    Csobay-Novak, Csaba
    Olah, Zoltan
    Nagy, Zsuzsa
    Merkely, Bela
    Szigeti, Krisztian
    Osvath, Szabolcs
    Sotonyi, Peter
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (01) : 246 - 253
  • [25] ROUTINE USE OF LIMITED ABDOMINAL AORTOGRAPHY WITH DIGITAL SUBTRACTION CAROTID AND CEREBRAL-ANGIOGRAPHY
    HANS, SS
    ZESKIND, HJ
    STROKE, 1995, 26 (07) : 1221 - 1224
  • [26] Comparison Between CTA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of Ruptured Aneurysms
    Philipp, Lucas R.
    McCracken, D. Jay
    McCracken, Courtney E.
    Halani, Sameer H.
    Lovasik, Brendan P.
    Salehani, Arsalaan A.
    Boulter, Jason H.
    Cawley, C. Michael
    Grossberg, Jonathan A.
    Barrow, Daniel L.
    Pradilla, Gustavo
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (05) : 769 - 777
  • [27] Initial Experience Using Digital Variance Angiography in Context of Prostatic Artery Embolization in Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography
    Alizadeh, Leona S.
    Gyano, Marcell
    Gog, Istvan
    Szigeti, Krisztian
    Osvath, Szabolcs
    Kiss, Janos P.
    Yel, Ibrahim
    Koch, Vitali
    Gruenewald, Leon D.
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Booz, Christian
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (04) : 689 - 697
  • [28] Pain in femoral arteriography - A double-blind, randomized, clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of the iso-osmolar iodixanol 270 mgI/ml and the low-osmolar iomeprol 300 mgI/ml in 9 European centers
    Manke, C
    Marcus, C
    Page, A
    Puey, J
    Batakis, O
    Fog, A
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2003, 44 (06) : 590 - 596
  • [29] Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis:: Assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography
    Elgersma, OEH
    Buijs, PC
    Wüst, AFJ
    van der Graaf, Y
    Eikelboom, BC
    Mali, WPTM
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (03) : 777 - 783
  • [30] Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of the liver transplants
    Housseini, Ahmed M.
    Bozlar, Ugur
    Schmitt, Timothy M.
    Bonatti, Hugo
    Arslan, Bulent
    Turba, Ulku C.
    Khalil, Tarek H.
    Hagspiel, Klaus D.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2009, 33 (02) : 102 - 109