ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CROTALID VENOMS AGAINST ORAL SNAKE FLORA AND OTHER CLINICAL BACTERIA

被引:46
作者
TALAN, DA
CITRON, DM
OVERTURF, GD
SINGER, B
FROMAN, P
GOLDSTEIN, EJC
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,OLIVE VIEW MED CTR,DEPT PEDIAT,SYLMAR,CA 91342
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,SANTA MONICA HOSP,MED CTR,SCH MED,RM ALDEN RES LAB,SANTA MONICA,CA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/infdis/164.1.195
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Despite heavy oral and fang contamination of crotalid species with a wide variety of potentially pathogenic bacteria, crotalid envenomation is associated with a low incidence of bacterial infection. Minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of venoms from three crotalid species were determined against six aerobic and eight anaerobic reference and oral crotalid microorganisms. All anaerobic isolates were resistant to > 20,480-mu-g/ml, whereas variable activity (range, 5-20,480-mu-g/ml) was observed for aerobic strains. Further studies against other aerobic clinical isolates demonstrated that venom had the greatest activity (MIC, less-than-or-equal-to 80-mu-g/ml) against staphylococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Proteus, and Morganella species. Inhibitory activity was lost with prolonged incubation for many gram-negative species. Crotalid venoms are broadly active against aerobic gram-negative and -positive bacteria. This activity may play a role in the low incidence of infection after envenomation injuries.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 198
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
BAMBERY D, 1984, J INDIAN MED ASSOC, V82, P410
[2]   ANTIBIOTICS IN TESTS FOR TOXICITY OF SNAKE VENOM [J].
BOYS, F ;
BEAMER, P ;
SMITH, HM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1960, 174 (03) :306-307
[3]   THE TREATMENT OF CROTALID ENVENOMATION WITHOUT ANTIVENIN [J].
BURCH, JM ;
AGARWAL, R ;
MATTOX, KL ;
FELICIANO, DV ;
JORDAN, GL .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1988, 28 (01) :35-43
[4]   BACTERIOLOGY OF RATTLESNAKE VENOM AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THERAPY [J].
GOLDSTEIN, EJC ;
CITRON, DM ;
GONZALEZ, H ;
RUSSELL, FE ;
FINEGOLD, SM .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1979, 140 (05) :818-821
[5]   USE OF EXCISIONAL THERAPY IN MANAGEMENT OF SNAKEBITE [J].
HUANG, TT ;
LYNCH, JB ;
LARSON, DL ;
LEWIS, SR .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1974, 179 (05) :598-607
[6]   AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC FLORA OF RATTLESNAKE FANGS AND VENOM - THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS [J].
LEDBETTER, EO ;
KUTSCHER, AE .
ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1969, 19 (06) :770-+
[7]   HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT OF PIT VIPER VENENATIONS [J].
PARRISH, HM ;
HAYES, RH .
CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1970, 3 (03) :501-&
[8]  
Russell F.E., 1980, SNAKE VENOM POISONIN, P139
[9]  
STOKER JF, 1986, J APPL BACTERIOL, V61, P383
[10]   RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF 3 MONOSPECIFIC ANTIVENOMS FOR BITES BY THE MALAYAN PIT VIPER (CALLOSELASMA-RHODOSTOMA) IN SOUTHERN THAILAND - CLINICAL AND LABORATORY CORRELATIONS [J].
WARRELL, DA ;
LOOAREESUWAN, S ;
THEAKSTON, RDG ;
PHILLIPS, RE ;
CHANTHAVANICH, P ;
VIRAVAN, C ;
SUPANARANOND, W ;
KARBWANG, J ;
HO, M ;
HUTTON, RA ;
VEJCHO, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1986, 35 (06) :1235-1247