Results of Preoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Yoon, Mee Sun [1 ]
Nam, Taek-Keun [1 ]
Kim, Hyeong-Rok [2 ]
Nah, Byung-Sik [1 ]
Chung, Woong-Ki [1 ]
Kim, Young-Jin [2 ]
Ahn, Sung-Ja [1 ]
Song, Ju-Young [1 ]
Jeong, Jae-Uk [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Med Sch, Dept Surg, Gwangju, South Korea
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL | 2008年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Preoperative chemoradiotherapy;
D O I
10.3857/jkstro.2008.26.4.247
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate anal sphincter preservation rates, survival rates, and prognostic factors in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty patients with pathologic confirmed rectal cancer and treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy between January 1999 and June 2007. Of the 150 patients, the 82 who completed the scheduled chemoradiotherapy, received definitive surgery at our hospital, and did not have distant metastasis upon initial diagnosis were enrolled in this study. The radiation dose delivered to the whole pelvis ranged from 41.4 to 46.0 Gy (median 44.0 Gy) using daily fractions of 1.8 similar to 2.0 Gy at 5 days per week and a boost dose to the primary tumor and high risk area up to a total of 43.2 similar to 54 Gy (median 50.4 Gy). Sixty patients (80.5%) received 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin, while 16 patients (19.5%) were administered 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin every 4 weeks concurrently during radiotherapy. Surgery was performed for 3 to 45 weeks (median 7 weeks) after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Results: The sphincter preservation rates for all patients were 73.2% (60/82). Of the 48 patients whose tumor was located at less than 5 cm away from the anal verge, 31 (64.6%) underwent sphincter-saving surgery. Moreover, of the 34 patients whose tumor was located at greater than or equal to 5 cm away from the anal verge, 29 (85.3%) were able to preserve their anal sphincter. A pathologic complete response was achieved in 14.6% (12/82) of all patients. The downstaging rates were 42.7% (35/82) for the T stage, 75.5% (37/49) for the N stage, and 67.1% (55/82) for the overall stages. The median follow-up period was 38 months (range 11 similar to 107 months). The overall 5-year survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control rates were 67.4%, 58.9% and 84.4%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates based on the pathologic stage were 100% for stage 0 (n=12), 59.1 % for stage I (n=16), 78.6% for stage II (n=30), 36.9% for stage III (n=23), and one patient with pathologic stage IV was alive for 43 months (p=0.02). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 77.8% for stage 0, 63.6 % for stage I, 58.9% for stage II, 51.1% for stage III, and 0% for stage IV (p<0.001). The 5-year locoregional control rates were 88.9% for stage 0, 93.8% for stage I, 91.1% for stage II, 68.2% for stage III, and one patient with pathologic stage IV was alive without local recurrence (p=0.01). The results of a multivariate analysis with age (<= 55 vs. >55), clinical stage (I+II vs. III), radiotherapy to surgery interval (<= 6 weeks vs. >6 weeks), operation type (sphincter preservation vs. no preservation), pathologic T stage, pathologic N stage, pathologic overall stage (0 vs. I+II vs. III+IV), and pathologic response (complete vs. non-CR), only age and pathologic N stage were significant predictors of overall survival, pathologic overall stage for disease-free survival, and pathologic N stage for locoregional control rates, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 25 patients (local recurrence in 10 patients, distant metastasis in 13 patients, and both in 2 patients). Acute hematologic toxicity (>= grade 3) during chemoradiotherapy was observed in 2 patients, while skin toxicity was observed in 1 patient. Complications developing within 60 days after surgery and required admission or surgical intervention, were observed in 11 patients: anastomotic leakage in 5 patients, pelvic abscess in 2 patients, and others in 4 patients. Conclusion: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was an effective modality to achieve downstaging and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer cases with a relatively low toxicity. Pathologic N stage was a statistically significant prognostic factor for survival and locoregional control and so, more intensified postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 256
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Which Patients Benefit from Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Intermediate Staged Rectal Cancer?
    Yoon, Won Sup
    Park, Won
    Choi, Doo Ho
    Ahn, Yong Chan
    Chun, Ho Kyung
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Kang, Won Ki
    Park, Young Suk
    Park, Joon Oh
    Lim, Ho-Yeong
    Park, Se Hoon
    Lee, Jeeyun
    ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 34 (1-2): : 36 - 41
  • [32] Tumor compactness improves the preoperative volumetry-based prediction of the pathological complete response of rectal cancer after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy
    Hsu, Che-Yu
    Wang, Chun-Wei
    Kuo, Chia-Chun
    Chen, Yu-Hsuan
    Lan, Keng-Hsueh
    Cheng, Ann-Lii
    Kuo, Sung-Hsin
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (05) : 7921 - 7934
  • [33] Reappraisal of pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with rectal cancer receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Yeo, Seung-Gu
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Park, Ji Won
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    Kim, Byung Chang
    Baek, Ji Yeon
    Kim, Sun Young
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    TUMORI, 2013, 99 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [34] Histological differences between preoperative chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer: a clinicopathological study
    Sakuyama, Naoki
    Kojima, Motohiro
    Kawano, Shingo
    Akimoto, Tetsuo
    Saito, Norio
    Ito, Masaaki
    Ochiai, Atsushi
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 66 (05) : 273 - 280
  • [35] Clinical Prediction of Pathological Complete Response After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    Kim, Young Jin
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (06) : 698 - 703
  • [36] Induction chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in preoperative treatment of rectal cancer - long-term results of phase II OIGIT-01 Trial
    Golo, Danijela
    But-Hadzic, Jasna
    Anderluh, Franc
    Brecelj, Erik
    Edhemovic, Ibrahim
    Jeromen, Ana
    Omejc, Mirko
    Oblak, Irena
    Secerov-Ermenc, Ajra
    Velenik, Vaneja
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 52 (03) : 267 - 274
  • [37] Lymph node retrieval after resection of rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Latkauskas, Tadas
    Lizdenis, Paulius
    Janciauskiene, Rasa
    Pranys, Darius
    Tamelis, Algimantas
    Pavalkis, Dainius
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2010, 46 (05): : 299 - 304
  • [38] Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer and impact on outcomes - A population-based study
    Asli, Linn M.
    Johannesen, Tom B.
    Myklebust, Tor A.
    Moller, Bjorn
    Eriksen, Morten Tandberg
    Guren, Marianne Gronlie
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 (03) : 446 - 453
  • [39] Concurrent chemoradiation with capecitabine and weekly irinotecan as preoperative treatment for rectal cancer: results from a phase I/II study
    G Klautke
    U Küchenmeister
    T Foitzik
    K Ludwig
    F Prall
    E Klar
    R Fietkau
    British Journal of Cancer, 2006, 94 : 976 - 981
  • [40] Effects of omeprazole in improving concurrent chemoradiotherapy efficacy in rectal cancer
    Jin-Liang Zhang
    Min Liu
    Qing Yang
    Shi-Yong Lin
    Hong-Bo Shan
    Hui-Yun Wang
    Guo-Liang Xu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, 23 (14) : 2575 - 2584