Results of Preoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Yoon, Mee Sun [1 ]
Nam, Taek-Keun [1 ]
Kim, Hyeong-Rok [2 ]
Nah, Byung-Sik [1 ]
Chung, Woong-Ki [1 ]
Kim, Young-Jin [2 ]
Ahn, Sung-Ja [1 ]
Song, Ju-Young [1 ]
Jeong, Jae-Uk [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Med Sch, Dept Surg, Gwangju, South Korea
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL | 2008年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Preoperative chemoradiotherapy;
D O I
10.3857/jkstro.2008.26.4.247
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate anal sphincter preservation rates, survival rates, and prognostic factors in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty patients with pathologic confirmed rectal cancer and treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy between January 1999 and June 2007. Of the 150 patients, the 82 who completed the scheduled chemoradiotherapy, received definitive surgery at our hospital, and did not have distant metastasis upon initial diagnosis were enrolled in this study. The radiation dose delivered to the whole pelvis ranged from 41.4 to 46.0 Gy (median 44.0 Gy) using daily fractions of 1.8 similar to 2.0 Gy at 5 days per week and a boost dose to the primary tumor and high risk area up to a total of 43.2 similar to 54 Gy (median 50.4 Gy). Sixty patients (80.5%) received 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin, while 16 patients (19.5%) were administered 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin every 4 weeks concurrently during radiotherapy. Surgery was performed for 3 to 45 weeks (median 7 weeks) after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Results: The sphincter preservation rates for all patients were 73.2% (60/82). Of the 48 patients whose tumor was located at less than 5 cm away from the anal verge, 31 (64.6%) underwent sphincter-saving surgery. Moreover, of the 34 patients whose tumor was located at greater than or equal to 5 cm away from the anal verge, 29 (85.3%) were able to preserve their anal sphincter. A pathologic complete response was achieved in 14.6% (12/82) of all patients. The downstaging rates were 42.7% (35/82) for the T stage, 75.5% (37/49) for the N stage, and 67.1% (55/82) for the overall stages. The median follow-up period was 38 months (range 11 similar to 107 months). The overall 5-year survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control rates were 67.4%, 58.9% and 84.4%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates based on the pathologic stage were 100% for stage 0 (n=12), 59.1 % for stage I (n=16), 78.6% for stage II (n=30), 36.9% for stage III (n=23), and one patient with pathologic stage IV was alive for 43 months (p=0.02). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 77.8% for stage 0, 63.6 % for stage I, 58.9% for stage II, 51.1% for stage III, and 0% for stage IV (p<0.001). The 5-year locoregional control rates were 88.9% for stage 0, 93.8% for stage I, 91.1% for stage II, 68.2% for stage III, and one patient with pathologic stage IV was alive without local recurrence (p=0.01). The results of a multivariate analysis with age (<= 55 vs. >55), clinical stage (I+II vs. III), radiotherapy to surgery interval (<= 6 weeks vs. >6 weeks), operation type (sphincter preservation vs. no preservation), pathologic T stage, pathologic N stage, pathologic overall stage (0 vs. I+II vs. III+IV), and pathologic response (complete vs. non-CR), only age and pathologic N stage were significant predictors of overall survival, pathologic overall stage for disease-free survival, and pathologic N stage for locoregional control rates, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 25 patients (local recurrence in 10 patients, distant metastasis in 13 patients, and both in 2 patients). Acute hematologic toxicity (>= grade 3) during chemoradiotherapy was observed in 2 patients, while skin toxicity was observed in 1 patient. Complications developing within 60 days after surgery and required admission or surgical intervention, were observed in 11 patients: anastomotic leakage in 5 patients, pelvic abscess in 2 patients, and others in 4 patients. Conclusion: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was an effective modality to achieve downstaging and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer cases with a relatively low toxicity. Pathologic N stage was a statistically significant prognostic factor for survival and locoregional control and so, more intensified postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 256
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
    Kurt, M
    Ozkan, L
    Ercan, H
    Kahraman, S
    Zorluoglu, A
    Gurel, S
    Memik, F
    Engin, K
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 52 (64) : 1095 - 1100
  • [22] Clinical outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in octogenarian with locally advanced rectal cancer
    Nishikawa, Takeshi
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Hata, Keisuke
    Emoto, Shigenobu
    Murono, Koji
    Sasaki, Kazuhito
    Tanaka, Toshiaki
    Nozawa, Hiroaki
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 11 (02) : 181 - 188
  • [23] Mucinous Rectal Cancer: Effectiveness of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Prognosis
    Ui Sup Shin
    Chang Sik Yu
    Jong Hoon Kim
    Tae Won Kim
    Seok-Byoung Lim
    Sang Nam Yoon
    Yong Sik Yoon
    Chan Wook Kim
    Jin Cheon Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18 : 2232 - 2239
  • [24] Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer experience in 76 patients
    Bannura C, Guillermo
    Barrera E, Alejandro
    Melo L, Carlos
    Contreras P, Jaime
    Soto C, Daniel
    REVISTA CHILENA DE CIRUGIA, 2010, 62 (06): : 607 - 613
  • [25] Effect of anaemia on the response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Bong, Jun Woo
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Ryu, Hyoseon
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Park, In Ja
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (05) : E286 - E291
  • [26] The Impact of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy on Advanced Low Rectal Cancer
    Kao, Ping-Sheng
    Chang, Shih-Ching
    Wang, Ling-Wei
    Lee, Rheun-Chuan
    Liang, Wen-Yi
    Lin, Tzu-Chen
    Chen, Wei-Shone
    Jiang, Jeng-Kai
    Yang, Shung-Haur
    Wang, Huann-Sheng
    Lin, Jen-Kou
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 102 (07) : 771 - 777
  • [27] Ten year results of preoperative radiation in the treatment of rectal cancer
    Reed, WP
    Garb, JL
    Stark, AJ
    Chabot, JR
    Friedmann, P
    CHIRURG, 1996, 67 (06): : 621 - 624
  • [28] Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: Acute Toxicity, Compliance with Treatment, and Early Results
    Valentine Guimas
    Jihane Boustani
    Benjamin Schipman
    Nicolas Lescut
    Marc Puyraveau
    Jean François Bosset
    Stéphanie Servagi-Vernat
    Drugs & Aging, 2016, 33 : 419 - 425
  • [29] Detection of rectal cancer and response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy
    Kim, Min Ju
    Lee, Soon Jin
    Lee, Jung Hee
    Kim, Seung Hoon
    Chun, Ho Kyung
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Lim, Hyo Keun
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 30 (06) : 848 - 853
  • [30] The influence of the treatment response on the impact of resection margin status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Lee, Joo Ho
    Chie, Eui Kyu
    Kim, Kyubo
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Park, Kyu Joo
    Park, Jae-Gahb
    Kang, Gyeong Hoon
    Han, Sae-Won
    Oh, Do-Youn
    Im, Seock-Ah
    Kim, Tae-You
    Bang, Yung-Jue
    Ha, Sung W.
    BMC CANCER, 2013, 13