HPWS and climate for inclusion: a moral legitimacy lens

被引:2
作者
Harrison, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Boekhorst, Janet A. [2 ]
Yu, Yin [1 ]
机构
[1] NEOMA Business Sch, Dept People & Organisat, Mont St Aignan, France
[2] Univ Waterloo, Conrad Business Entrepreneurship & Technol Ctr, Waterloo, ON, Canada
来源
EQUALITY DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION | 2018年 / 37卷 / 05期
关键词
High-performance work systems; Climate for inclusion; Moral legitimacy;
D O I
10.1108/EDI-12-2016-0112
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to apply insights from the moral legitimacy theory to understand how climate for inclusion (CFI) is cultivated at the individual and collective levels, thereby highlighting the influence of employee perceptions of inclusion-oriented high-performance work systems (HPWS) on CFI. Design/methodology/approach A multi-level conceptual framework is introduced to explain how employee perceptions develop about the moral legitimacy of inclusion-oriented HPWS and the subsequent influence on CFI. Findings CFI is theorized to manifest when employees perceive inclusion-oriented HPWS as morally legitimate according to four unit-level features. Employees with a strong moral identity will be particularly attuned to the moral legitimacy of each of the unit-level HPWS features, thereby strengthening the perceived HPWS and CFI relationship at the individual level. The convergence of individual-level perceptions of CFI to the collective level will be strongest when climate variability is low for majority and minority groups. Practical implications Organizations seeking to develop CFI should consider the role of HPWS and the perceived moral legitimacy of such systems. This consideration may involve policy amendments to include a broadened scope of HPWS. Originality/value This paper explores how employee perceptions of the moral legitimacy of HPWS can help or hinder CFI, thereby offering a novel framework for future inclusion and human resource management research.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 505
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[51]   Recognizing the benefits of diversity: When and how does diversity increase group performance? [J].
Roberge, Marie-Elene ;
van Dick, Rolf .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 20 (04) :295-308
[52]   Human resource practices, organizational climate, and customer satisfaction [J].
Rogg, KL ;
Schmidt, DB ;
Shull, C ;
Schmitt, N .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (04) :431-449
[53]  
Rosenberg A., 2015, WASHINGTON POST
[54]   APPLICANTS' AND EMPLOYEES' REACTIONS TO CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: THE MODERATING EFFECTS OF FIRST-PARTY JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS AND MORAL IDENTITY [J].
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Shao, Ruodan ;
Thornton, Meghan A. ;
Skarlicki, Daniel P. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (04) :895-933
[55]   The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management [J].
Rynes, Sara L. ;
Giluk, Tamara L. ;
Brown, Kenneth G. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (05) :987-1008
[56]   Inclusion and Diversity in Work Groups: A Review and Model for Future Research [J].
Shore, Lynn M. ;
Randel, Amy E. ;
Chung, Beth G. ;
Dean, Michelle A. ;
Ehrhart, Karen Holcombe ;
Singh, Gangaram .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 37 (04) :1262-1289
[57]   Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going? [J].
Shore, Lynn M. ;
Chung-Herrera, Beth G. ;
Dean, Michelle A. ;
Ehrhart, Karen Holcombe ;
Jung, Don I. ;
Randel, Amy E. ;
Singh, Gangaram .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2009, 19 (02) :117-133
[58]   Strategic human resource practice implementation: The critical role of line management [J].
Sikora, David M. ;
Ferris, Gerald R. .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 24 (03) :271-281
[59]  
Singh V., 2009, MANAGEMENT INT, V13, P23
[60]   MANAGING LEGITIMACY - STRATEGIC AND INSTITUTIONAL APPROACHES [J].
SUCHMAN, MC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (03) :571-610