Use of Clinical UV Chamber to Disinfect Dental Impressions: A Comparative Study

被引:19
作者
Aeran, Himanshu [1 ]
Sharma, Sakshi [1 ]
Kumar, Varun [1 ]
Gupta, Neelu [2 ]
机构
[1] Seema Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Rishikesh, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Seema Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Gen Pathol & Microbiol, Rishikesh, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Cross contamination; Disinfection; Infection control; Pathogenic;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2015/14025.6353
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Dental impressions are potential source of infection in a prosthodontic practice. Risk of transmission of infection through saliva, blood etc is considered as hazard for both dentist as well as dental auxiliary staff. A number of methods are currently employed for disinfecting the impressions which are technique sensitive and time consuming. This study focuses on disinfecting impression using dental UV chamber which is commonly employed for storing sterilized instruments. Aim: The aim of this invitro study was to evaluate the use of clinical UV chamber to disinfect various impression materials at different time intervals and its comparison with 2% glutaraldehyde using standard immersion technique. Materials and Methods: Total sample size of 180 specimens was taken from three different impression materials. The impressions were made from 30 dentulous subjects. A total of ten impressions were made for each impression material i. . alginate, addition were taken from each impression. Out of 6 punch sample, one was kept as control, second was disinfected by immersing in freshly prepared 2% glutaraldehyde solution for 10 minutes and remaining four were exposed to UV rays for 3 minutes, 6 minutes, 10 minutes and 15 minutes using dental UV chamber. Amount of disinfection achieved was evaluated by counting the colonies over the culture plates with the help of digital colony. Results: The results showed that the mean CFUs for alginate were found to be i. e. 11797.40+/-5989.73 (mean+/-SD). The mean CFUs for addition silicone impression material was found 7095.40 with a standard deviation of 4268.83 and the mean CFUs for polyether impression material was found to be 2168.92+/-1676 (mean+/-SD). Conclusion: For alginate and addition silicone impression material, disinfection was achieved on exposure to UV rays for a period of 10 minutes. However, for polyether impression material 3 minutes of exposure to UV rays was sufficient to cause complete disinfection.
引用
收藏
页码:ZC67 / ZC70
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Al-Jabrah O, 2007, INT J PROSTHODONT, V20, P299
[2]  
Anand Vijay, 2013, J Pharm Bioallied Sci, V5, pS80, DOI 10.4103/0975-7406.113302
[3]   Comparison of UVC light and chemicals for disinfection of surfaces in hospital isolation units [J].
Andersen, B. M. ;
Banrud, H. ;
Boe, E. ;
Bjordal, O. ;
Drangsholt, F. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (07) :729-734
[4]  
Connor C, 1991, Int J Prosthodont, V4, P337
[5]  
Craig RG, 1998, ADV DENT RES, V2, P51
[6]  
Devine DA, 2011, J APPL MICROBIOL, V91, P786
[7]  
JENNINGS K J, 1991, International Journal of Prosthodontics, V4, P382
[8]   Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion [J].
Johnson, GH ;
Chellis, KD ;
Gordon, GE ;
Lepe, X .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 79 (04) :446-453
[9]  
Junevicius J, 2004, BALTIC DENT MAXILLOF, V6, P20
[10]  
Owen C P, 1993, Int J Prosthodont, V6, P480