How to individualise your balanced scorecard

被引:5
作者
Ahn, Heinz [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Environm Econ & Ind Controlling, Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Chair Operat Res & Logist, Aachen, Germany
关键词
Balanced scorecard; Mission achievement; Strategic management; Customization; Business improvement;
D O I
10.1108/13683040510588792
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The paper aims to explain how the balanced scorecard concept can be improved through customising the normal four perspectives. Design/methodology/approach - An analysis of existing methods for developing a balanced scorecard reveals that the goals identified by using the approaches may not correspond to the company's mission and values. Against this background, fundamental multi-criteria decision-making principles are applied to design a method which helps to overcome this weakness. Findings - Since the core idea is to derive the perspectives directly from the mission statements of a company, the method described here helps to develop an individualized balanced scorecard. A case study illustrates how the method works in practice. Practical implications - The paper has practical relevance for the effectiveness and credibility of the balanced scorecard inside a company, particularly as it is gaining additional importance due to the fact that the concept is increasingly being used for external reporting. Originality/value - Pointing out how an important methodical shortcoming of the balanced scorecard concept can be eliminated, the paper is especially of interest for practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 12
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Ahn H, 2003, EFFEKTIVITATS EFFIZI
[2]  
Atkinson AA, 1997, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V38, P25
[3]  
Deutsche Lufthansa AG, 2000, UMW 1999 2000
[4]  
Kaplan R.S., 1996, BALANCED SCORECARD T, DOI DOI 10.2307/41165876
[5]  
Keeney R.L., 1992, VALUE FOCUSED THINKI
[6]  
Klingenberg C, 2000, BALANCED SCORECARD C, P83
[7]  
Kuting K., 2001, INTERNET EXTERNE REC
[8]   The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures [J].
Lipe, MG ;
Salterio, SE .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2000, 75 (03) :283-298
[9]  
Neely A., 2002, PERFORMANCE PRISM SC
[10]  
Neely A., 2004, PERFORMANCE MEASUREM, P763