GROWTH, YIELD, AND QUALITY OF FORAGE MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES

被引:66
|
作者
COX, WJ [1 ]
KALONGE, S [1 ]
CHERNEY, DJR [1 ]
REID, WS [1 ]
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV, DEPT ANIM SCI, ITHACA, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500020033x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Maize (Zea mays L.) forage producers need more information on how N management affects dry matter (DM) yield, forage quality, and residual soil NO3--N concentrations. Studies were conducted in New York to evaluate three hybrids under different sidedress N rates (0, 56, 140, and 255 kg N ha-1 at the V4 stage) and timing (70 + 70 kg N ha-1 at V4 and V8 and 75 + 75 + 75 kg N ha-1 at V4, V8, and R1 stages). The DM yields, which averaged 25% lower in 1991 (12.3 Mg ha-1) compared to 1990 (16.9 Mg ha-1), responded curvilinearly to N rates with maximum economic yields of 140 and 160 kg N ha-1, respectively. Whole-plant neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and N concentrations responded linearly to N rates in 1990 indicating that forage quality improved with each additional increment of N. Higher N rates, however, increased residual soil NO3--N concentrations in the upper 0.3 m soil depth in 1990 (0, 3, 30, and 32 mg kg-1) and 1991 (0, 0, 17, and 17 mg kg-1 for the 0, 56, 140, and 225 kg N treatments, respectively). Split-N applications compared to respective single rate N applications did not increase DM yields, improve forage quality, or decrease residual soil NO3--N concentrations. When applying higher rates of N fertilizer, maize forage producers must balance potential benefits of higher DM yields and improved forage quality with the potential risk of increased residual soil NO3--N concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 347
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INFLUENCE OF MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES ON FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUDANGRASS
    SINGH, T
    RAI, SD
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1975, 45 (08): : 372 - 376
  • [2] YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOYBEAN FORAGE AS AFFECTED BY CULTIVAR AND MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES
    HINTZ, RW
    ALBRECHT, KA
    OPLINGER, ES
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1992, 84 (05) : 795 - 798
  • [3] EFFECT OF MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES ON REGROWTH, BIOLOGICAL YIELD AND QUALITY OF OAT GROWN FOR FORAGE
    DEO, GD
    RAI, SD
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1975, 45 (09): : 397 - 402
  • [4] MODELING THE EFFECTS OF WEATHER AND MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES ON MAIZE YIELD
    HOLLINGER, SE
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1988, 44 (01) : 81 - 97
  • [5] Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Use of Forage Maize under Different Nitrogen Application Rates in Two Boreal Locations
    Liimatainen, Anniina
    Sairanen, Auvo
    Jaakkola, Seija
    Kokkonen, Tuomo
    Kuoppala, Kaisa
    Jokiniemi, Tapani
    Makela, Pirjo S. A.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [6] YIELD AND QUALITY OF FORAGE MAIZE HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT GROWTH-STAGES
    HSU, FH
    HONG, KY
    LEE, KC
    HSU, AL
    JOURNAL OF THE AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF CHINA, 1987, (139): : 44 - 55
  • [7] TILLAGE AND NITROGEN-SOURCE EFFECTS ON GROWTH, YIELD, AND QUALITY OF FORAGE MAIZE
    MATARUKA, DF
    COX, WJ
    PLEASANT, JM
    VANES, HM
    KLAUSNER, SD
    ZOBEL, RW
    CROP SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (06) : 1316 - 1321
  • [8] INTENSIVE CROP MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES ON WHEAT YIELD AND QUALITY
    MOHAMED, MA
    STEINER, JJ
    WRIGHT, SD
    BHANGOO, MS
    MILLHOUSE, DE
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1990, 82 (04) : 701 - 707
  • [9] EVALUATING THE FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY POTENTIAL OF DIFFERENT MAIZE CULTIVARS UNDER DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES
    Ibrahim, M.
    Maqbool, M. M.
    Ayub, M.
    Ahmed, M., I
    Tahir, M.
    Nadeem, M. S.
    UlHaq, T.
    Nadeem, M. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN AGRICULTURE, 2014, 3 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [10] RESPONSE OF TRANSPLANTED RICE TO NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION UNDER DIFFERENT WEED MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES
    SHARMA, HL
    SINGH, CM
    TRIPATHI, B
    TROPICAL PEST MANAGEMENT, 1986, 32 (02): : 108 - 110